1994
DOI: 10.1016/0002-8223(94)91946-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of waist measurements: A methodologic issue in longitudinal studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the panel found no evidence that variation in WC measurement protocol had substantial influence on the prediction of risk for morbidity or mortality risk, it is clear that variation in placement can profoundly influence the absolute WC measure (129–135) (Table S11). Wang et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the panel found no evidence that variation in WC measurement protocol had substantial influence on the prediction of risk for morbidity or mortality risk, it is clear that variation in placement can profoundly influence the absolute WC measure (129–135) (Table S11). Wang et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the panel found no evidence that variation in WC measurement protocol had substantial influence on the prediction of risk for morbidity or mortality risk, it is clear that variation in placement can profoundly influence the absolute WC measure (129)(130)(131)(132)(133)(134)(135) (Table S11). Wang et al (134) reported that for a racially mixed sample of 49 males and 62 females with primarily normal weight, the greatest absolute difference between the lowest and highest measurements from four common WC protocols obtained between the lowest rib and iliac crest was~2 cm for men and~4 cm for women.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Carefully planned and collected process evaluation data are then used to help clarify relationships among theoretical constructs and enhance understanding of program effects by linking intervention exposure to study outcomes [8,43,[47][48][49][50]. An overview of the study measures are provided in Table 3 (primary outcome) and 4 (cognitive and motivational mediators) [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. These are the outputs that are presented in the logic model.…”
Section: Approach To Process Evaluation and Assessment Of Mediators Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A variety of measures of body mass and body fat exist, each measuring and expressing a slightly different aspect of general obesity, fat distribution, patterning, or fat percentage (57)(58)(59). Body mass index (weight/height 2 ) is considered a good surrogate measure of percent body fat (60) or total adipose tissue as measured by magnetic resonance imaging (r women = 0.92, r men = 0.85) (61).…”
Section: Insulin Insulin Resistance and Obesitymentioning
confidence: 99%