2019
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpy045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of vulnerability to catastrophic wind between Abies plantation forests and natural mixed forests in northern Japan

Abstract: The risk of extreme events due to weather and climate change, such as winds of unprecedented magnitude, is predicted to increase throughout this century. Artificial ecosystems, such as coniferous plantation forests, can suffer irreversible deterioration due to even a slight change in environmental conditions. However, few studies have examined the effects of converting natural forests to plantations on their vulnerability to catastrophic winds. By modelling the 2004 windthrow event of Typhoon Songda in norther… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This assumption is required in order to omit the influence of canopy gap duration on the seed bank, as a decrease in seeds would be more severe under canopy gaps that were created earlier compared to those created recently, when gap size is equivalent. Most canopy gaps in this area, however, were likely to be created by the historically large typhoon occurring in the Hokkaido prefecture in 2004 52,53 . For interpretation of the interactive effects of gap creation and ungulate grazing on plant populations in other areas, attention to the difference in periods in which gaps were created across the focal area would be necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This assumption is required in order to omit the influence of canopy gap duration on the seed bank, as a decrease in seeds would be more severe under canopy gaps that were created earlier compared to those created recently, when gap size is equivalent. Most canopy gaps in this area, however, were likely to be created by the historically large typhoon occurring in the Hokkaido prefecture in 2004 52,53 . For interpretation of the interactive effects of gap creation and ungulate grazing on plant populations in other areas, attention to the difference in periods in which gaps were created across the focal area would be necessary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the D04 areas, eight domains were separately placed within D03 in order to save computational costs. The reason why we set these specific regions as D04 is that in these D04 areas, significant damages to forests were reported (Takano et al 2016;Morimoto et al 2019) and hence evaluating the numerical representations of the typhoon winds on these forest areas is critically important. The model settings here were exactly the same with those used in Ito et al (2016) except employing the 200 m grid areas.…”
Section: Numerical Model and Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4a). These areas A, B, and C include forests that were damaged by the typhoon (Takano et al 2016;Morimoto et al 2019), and each area A, B, and C is referred to as Nakagawa, Abashiri, and Niseko (see Fig. 1 of Takano et al 2016).…”
Section: Sensitivity To Horizontal Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a consequence, the ontogenic development and growth dynamics of trees in managed stands usually differ considerably from those in forests driven by natural stand dynamics (Korpel 1995;Lorimer et al 2001). This divergence has consequences for the life processes and functioning of trees and their populations, and the primary stress factors they are exposed to (Gray et al 2012;Morimoto et al 2019). The ontogeny of trees influences their morphological traits (Schröter et al 2012;Di Filippo et al 2017), growth potential (Sillet et al 2015;Pretzsch 2020), reaction to stress conditions (Domec et al 2015;Pretzsch 2022;Schmied et al 2022) and longevity (Woods 2008;Di Filippo et al 2015;Piovesan et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%