2021 Latin American Robotics Symposium (LARS), 2021 Brazilian Symposium on Robotics (SBR), and 2021 Workshop on Robotics in Edu 2021
DOI: 10.1109/lars/sbr/wre54079.2021.9605432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Visual SLAM Algorithms ORB-SLAM2, RTAB-Map and SPTAM in Internal and External Environments with ROS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonetheless, it is still an actively researched problem in robotics, so much so that the robotics research community is only now working towards designing benchmarks and mechanisms to compare different SLAM implementations. In recent years, there has been particularly intense research into VSLAM (visual SLAM) [71]. Specifically, the focus is on using primarily visual (camera) sensors to allow robots to track and keep local maps of their relative positions also in indoor environments (where GPS-based navigation fails).…”
Section: Simultaneous Localization and Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonetheless, it is still an actively researched problem in robotics, so much so that the robotics research community is only now working towards designing benchmarks and mechanisms to compare different SLAM implementations. In recent years, there has been particularly intense research into VSLAM (visual SLAM) [71]. Specifically, the focus is on using primarily visual (camera) sensors to allow robots to track and keep local maps of their relative positions also in indoor environments (where GPS-based navigation fails).…”
Section: Simultaneous Localization and Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the experiments it was possible to observe that the RTAB-Map overcomes the Kintinuous technique, with RMSE of 0.0555. [6] compares three SLAM-based algorithms: RTAB-Map, ORB-SLAM2 and SPTAM. Simulations were performed indoors and outdoors, where RTAB-Map demonstrated more accurate estimates outdoors with stereo cameras, reaching an error rate of 4.54%.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A lidar sensor (specifically, the Velodyne VLP 16) was utilized to scan and map the surrounding area [59,60]. This sensor allowed for the creation of a two-dimensional dynamic map that identifies and marks any obstacles that are present [61]. To ensure accurate positioning, a GNSS-RTK receiver (STONEX S990A RTK) was incorporated into the UGVs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%