Comparison of visual analog shade matching, a digital visual method with a cross-polarized light filter, and a spectrophotometer for dental color matching

Mahn, Eduardo; Tortora, Sofia C.; Olate, Barbara; Cacciuttolo, Franco; Kernitsky, Jeremy R; Jorquera, Gilbert

doi:10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.002

Cited by 44 publications

(51 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Then, 3268 manuscripts were excluded after revising the titles and summaries, leaving a total of 31 articles to be assessed for full-text review. Of these, 18 studies were excluded [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33]. Exclusion reasons are assumed in the PRISMA flow diagram of the research, which resulted in a total of 13 manuscripts in the meta-analysis [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…One should bear in mind that by using this filter, the intrinsic shade variations of natural teeth for shade analysis might be revealed. In addition, it can help remove unwanted reflections and diffuse light created by the flash which can obscure features in the dental teeth, and hence produce issues in communication with the dental technician [18,21]. Consequently, referring to the results of Sampaio et al, [27] the use of cross-polarizing filters was the most standardized method for both communication and color assessment.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Novel Trends in Dental Color Match Using Different Shade Selection Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Since color matching is considered a subjective procedure, accurate shade choice is often the most challenging stage of recreating the natural appearance of teeth. Furthermore, accurate determination of tooth color is imperative for the final outcome of dental restorations. The purpose of this research is to assess the accuracy of color match between diverse shade selection methods throughout a systematic review and meta-analysis. Two independent investigators (L.H. and R.B.) screened the literature in five electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials or in vitro papers studying the effect of using either digital shade selection or visual shade selection on the accuracy of color match were included. A total of 13 manuscripts comprised the meta-analysis. Color difference (ΔE) between restorations where the shade matching was performed by the conventional method was greater than those where the shade matching was performed by computerized methods (p = 0.007). According to the subgroup analysis, only the use of digital photographs for shade matching showed a reduction in the (ΔE) (p < 0.0001), while the use of a spectrophotometer has no advantages over the use of visual shade guide tabs (p = 0.57). On the other hand, global analysis showed that incorrect shade matching was higher when the conventional method using shade guide tabs was used (p < 0.001), irrespective of whether a spectrophotometer or a digital camera was used (p < 0.001). This study concluded that the use of digital photography and spectrophotometric measurements led to fewer color differences and less incorrect shade matching than conventional methods using color shade tabs.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Novel Trends in Dental Color Match Using Different Shade Selection Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…44,180 A stable light source such as a xenon light source (300 W Xe Arch Lamp, Oriel Instruments, Stratford, CT) may be added to minimize light source discrepancies. 147 Mahn et al 181 found no significant differences between a D7100…”

Section: Accuracy and Precision Of Digital Camerasmentioning

confidence: 94%

Visual and digital tooth shade selection methods, related effective factors and conditions, and their accuracy and precision: A literature review

Tabatabaian

Beyabanaki

Alirezaei

et al. 2021

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The evidence has outlined that digital photography provided easy accessibility, better laboratory communication, and great intraoral information for tooth color and characteristics [5,17,33,35]. Moreover, using the cross-polarized filter provides a beneficial outcome by eliminating or reducing the effect of scattering light from the environment, which interferes with the color measurements [33,36]. However, care must be taken on the professional learning curve of using a digital camera, techniques, associated equipment, and software-generated color to ensure the best accuracy and reliability of tooth shade selection [5].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Accuracy and Reliability of Tooth Shade Selection Using Different Instrumental Techniques: An In Vitro Study

Sirintawat

Leelaratrungruang

Poovarodom

et al. 2021

Sensors

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to investigate and compare the reliability and accuracy of tooth shade selection in the model using 30 milled crowns via five methods: (1) digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera with twin flash (TF) and polarized filter (DSLR + TF), (2) DSLR camera with a ring flash (RF) and polarized filter (DSLR + RF), (3) smartphone camera with light corrector and polarized filter (SMART), (4) intraoral scanner (IOS), and (5) spectrophotometer (SPEC). These methods were compared with the control group or manufacturer’s shade. The CIE Lab values (L, a, and b values) were obtained from five of the methods to indicate the color of the tooth. Adobe Photoshop was used to generate CIE Lab values from the digital photographs. The reliability was calculated from the intraclass correlation based on two repetitions. The accuracy was calculated from; (a) ΔE calculated by the formula comparing each method to the control group, (b) study and control groups were analyzed by using the Kruskal–Wallis test, and (c) the relationship between study and control groups were calculated using Spearman’s correlation. The reliability of the intraclass correlation of L, a, and b values obtained from the five methods showed satisfactory correlations ranging from 0.732–0.996, 0.887–0.994, and 0.884–0.999, respectively. The ΔE from all groups had statistically significant differences when compared to the border of clinical acceptance (ΔE = 6.8). The ΔE from DSLR + TF, DSLR + RF, SMART, and SPEC were higher than clinical acceptance (ΔE > 6.8), whereas the ΔE from IOS was 5.96 and all of the L, a, and b values were not statistically significantly different from the manufacturer’s shade (p < 0.01). The ΔE of the DSLR + RF group showed the least accuracy (ΔE = 19.98), whereas the ∆E of DSLR + TF, SMART, and SPEC showed similar accuracy ∆E (ΔE = 10.90, 10.57, and 11.57, respectively). The DSLR camera combined with a ring flash system and polarized filter provided the least accuracy. The intraoral scanner provided the highest accuracy. However, tooth shade selection deserves the combination of various techniques and a professional learning curve to establish the most accurate outcome.

show abstract

Comparison of visual analog shade matching, a digital visual method with a cross-polarized light filter, and a spectrophotometer for dental color matching

Cited by 44 publications

References 22 publications

Novel Trends in Dental Color Match Using Different Shade Selection Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Novel Trends in Dental Color Match Using Different Shade Selection Methods: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Visual and digital tooth shade selection methods, related effective factors and conditions, and their accuracy and precision: A literature review

The Accuracy and Reliability of Tooth Shade Selection Using Different Instrumental Techniques: An In Vitro Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About