2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10792-020-01564-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of vessel density in macular and peripapillary regions between primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudoexfoliation glaucoma using OCTA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Due to the fact that our comparable OCTA data is supported by the Image J data, we assume that the peripapillary vascular deficit in PXG and POAG does not differ quantitatively in eyes with comparable glaucoma severity. This is supported by further studies [ 12 , 14 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the fact that our comparable OCTA data is supported by the Image J data, we assume that the peripapillary vascular deficit in PXG and POAG does not differ quantitatively in eyes with comparable glaucoma severity. This is supported by further studies [ 12 , 14 , 18 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Rebolleda et al [ 16 ], who also used AngioPlex to examine peripapillary vascular parameters, were unable to determine any peripapillary vessel density differences with AngioPlex, while significant reductions in many peripapillary vascular parameters could be demonstrated using another OCTA device (AngioVue). Regarding the size of the FAZ, Köse et al [ 13 ] demonstrated a larger FAZ size for PXG than for POAG, while there were no significant differences in other studies [ 12 , 17 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations