1993
DOI: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92989-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of venous reflux assessed by duplex scanning and descending phlebography in chronic venous disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
64
2
5

Year Published

1994
1994
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
64
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…25 Venous valves are difficult to image clearly with ultrasound. Venous valves ensure that venous blood flows centrally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…25 Venous valves are difficult to image clearly with ultrasound. Venous valves ensure that venous blood flows centrally.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common criteria for pathological reflux were used, namely, peak reflux velocity Ͼ10 cm/s and duration of reflux Ͼ0.5 seconds after release of distal compression. 25,26 Pathological reflux was only diagnosed if both of the above criteria were fulfilled. Pathological reflux was categorized, therefore, as either "present" or "absent" for each venous segment (the statistical "nominal scale").…”
Section: Measurement Of Pathological Reflux On the Nominal Scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…58,59 In the diagnosis of venous reflux, duplex scanning has been shown to be superior to descending venography in correlating with the degree of venous reflux as measured by foot volumetry and with the clinical severity of disease as determined by clinical examination. [60][61][62][63] Duplex scanning is 84% sensitive and 88% specific in the diagnosis of deep venous insufficiency as compared with direct venous pressure measurements and venous filling times. 64 Arterial disease needs to be considered when evaluating patients with lower extremity ulcers.…”
Section: Diagnostic Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The refl ux was elicited by Valsalva manoeuvre presented for 5-10 seconds, and was defi ned as a backfl ow lasting ≥ 1 s (ref. 1,6,10,11 ). Haemodynamically signifi cant refl ux had a backfl ow velocity of Vmax ≥ 10 cm/s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%