2005
DOI: 10.1191/0959683605hl828rp
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of varve and 14C chronologies from Steel Lake, Minnesota, USA

Abstract: Annually laminated sediments (varves) offer an effective means of acquiring high-quality palaeoenvironmental records. However, the strength of a varve chronology can be compromised by a number of factors, such as missing varves, ambiguous laminations and human counting error. We assess the quality of a varve chronology for the last three millennia from Steel Lake, Minnesota, through comparisons with nine AMS 14C dates on terrestrial plant macrofossils from the same core. These comparisons revealed an overall 8… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even though radiocarbon dates older than varve chronologies have been reported in other studies (e.g. Sohlenius et al 2003;Tian et al 2005;Stanton et al 2010), the careful selection of terrestrial macrofossils for 14 C analysis and the reasonable distribution of radiocarbon dates with depth make the first possibility unlikely. It is more probable that varve counts were underestimated in consequence of interpretation of multiple annual calcite precipitation events or missing varves due to erosional processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even though radiocarbon dates older than varve chronologies have been reported in other studies (e.g. Sohlenius et al 2003;Tian et al 2005;Stanton et al 2010), the careful selection of terrestrial macrofossils for 14 C analysis and the reasonable distribution of radiocarbon dates with depth make the first possibility unlikely. It is more probable that varve counts were underestimated in consequence of interpretation of multiple annual calcite precipitation events or missing varves due to erosional processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Ojala & Francus 2002), whereas additional agecontrol is provided by the multiple dating approach combining different radiometric dating methods, such as 137 Cs, 210 Pb and 14 C (e.g. Lamoureux 2001;Tian et al 2005;Stanton et al 2010). If possible, tephra and stratigraphic data or other marker layers such as pollen, paleomagnetic dating or historic events should be used (Brauer et al 1999;Lüder et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although varve chronology can be compromised by a number of factors, such as missing or adding varves, ambiguous laminations and human counting error (e.g. Tian et al, 2005), we are confident that the error of varve chronology in the Lake XIL is no larger than 100 years. The age discrepancies may arise from some carbon reservoir effect within the aquatic ecosystems, or from older marginal organic material being incorporated into the sediment from the deepest part of the lake or from a combination of these processes (e.g.…”
Section: Explosive Basaltic Eruptionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Prior research suggests that localizing offsets between varve counts and 14 C age spreads is a more appropriate means of addressing such discrepancies, as opposed to spreading the offset cumulatively across the entire varved record and thereby potentially obscuring real temporal patterns (e.g. Tian et al 2005). Because of the uncertainty associated with its true duration, we have therefore eliminated the lowest portion of the 14 C-dated laminated portion of the core from subsequent time series analyses and treat the remainder of the record as being annually varved with no significant gaps.…”
Section: Geochronometry Age Modeling and Time Series Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%