The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
1986
DOI: 10.1109/tassp.1986.1164930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of various time delay estimation methods by computer simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It requires the other equation in order to track the correct source location. So we use the hyperbolic equation for TDOA (time difference of arrival) estimation [12] between distributed sensors. Finally, the cross point of the circle and International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks the hyperbola can be estimated as the source location.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It requires the other equation in order to track the correct source location. So we use the hyperbolic equation for TDOA (time difference of arrival) estimation [12] between distributed sensors. Finally, the cross point of the circle and International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks the hyperbola can be estimated as the source location.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many survey publications review the known approaches for time delay estimation, for instance (Björklund & Ljung, 2003;Ferretti, Maffezzoni, & Scattolini, 1995;Fertner & Sjölund, 1986;O'Dwyer, , 1996O'Dwyer & Ringwood, 1999;Viola & Walker, 2003). In the following, several time delay estimation techniques are reviewed, which are not based on specific excitation scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A very common approach for time delay estimation is the correlation technique, see Fertner and Sjölund (1986), Viola and Walker (2003), Barsanti and Tummala (2003), Benesty, Chen, and Huang (2004), Chen, Benesty, and Huang (2006), Dooley and Nandi (1998), , Grennberg and Sandell (1994), Hertz (1986), Jacovitti and Scarano (1993), Knapp and Carter (1976), Mamat and Fleming (1995), Najafi, Zekri, and Askari (2010), Ni, Shah, and Xiao (2008), Ni, Xiao, and Shah (2010), Nikias and Pan (1988), Park and Nam (2002), Rad, Lo, and Tsang (2003), Tabaru (2007) for examples thereof. The correlation technique is usually applied offline using a batch of input and output data or in a quasi-online way using a moving window data batch.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method keeps high accuracy comparing with other method [8] [9]. It only uses subtraction operations to get TDOA and expected to reduce design complexity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%