2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2004.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of various models for the simulation of a Core Disruptive Accident in the MARA 10 mock-up

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This code is based on the Finite Element Method and uses an explicit time integration algorithm (Robbe et al, 2003(Robbe et al, , 2004(Robbe et al, , 2005. This code is based on the Finite Element Method and uses an explicit time integration algorithm (Robbe et al, 2003(Robbe et al, , 2004(Robbe et al, , 2005.…”
Section: Diphasic Model In Europlexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This code is based on the Finite Element Method and uses an explicit time integration algorithm (Robbe et al, 2003(Robbe et al, , 2004(Robbe et al, , 2005. This code is based on the Finite Element Method and uses an explicit time integration algorithm (Robbe et al, 2003(Robbe et al, , 2004(Robbe et al, , 2005.…”
Section: Diphasic Model In Europlexusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The charge creating the gas bubble is located at the center of the liquid domain; the layer of air below the vessel cover is also visible. Right : schematic view of the MARA 10 configuration taken from [5] displaying the added structures included in the fluid-structure interaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%