2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of UV-degradation depth-profiles in polyethylene, polypropylene and an ethylene–propylene copolymer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar results were observed in a study using PP pellets as sorbents to remove organics from water solution; pyrene appeared to be able to diffuse only to some extent into the PP particle (Rice and Gold, 1984b). Similar differences between PE and PP have been observed in photo-degradation studies (Shyichuk et al, 2005). Degradation of PE reached all depths proportionally to the exposure time.…”
Section: Polypropylene (Pp) Sorptive Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Similar results were observed in a study using PP pellets as sorbents to remove organics from water solution; pyrene appeared to be able to diffuse only to some extent into the PP particle (Rice and Gold, 1984b). Similar differences between PE and PP have been observed in photo-degradation studies (Shyichuk et al, 2005). Degradation of PE reached all depths proportionally to the exposure time.…”
Section: Polypropylene (Pp) Sorptive Behaviorsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It has been noted that reaction rates are very effective near material surface, whereas they significantly decrease through the bars due to scarce oxygen concentration (oxygen diffusion limited reaction). The same outcomes have been found elsewhere [25], where comprehensive information on the modifications induced by outdoor aging on coPP/PE are provided.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…This spectral association with increased molecular weight has not been previously observed. [26] This has resulted in the reduction of the molecular weight peak observable within the spectrum of subsurface argon plasma peak intensity compared to that of the subsurface spectrum. In this instance, the addition of a peak around 1.4-2.3 eV for high-molecular-weight PGS-M is considered a marker of a more crystalline state in high-molecular-weight when compared to that of low-molecular-weight PGS-M.…”
Section: Figure 2 A) Offsetmentioning
confidence: 99%