2015
DOI: 10.5505/kjms.2015.72792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in the management of distal ureteral stones

Abstract: AIM: To compare the effi ciency of ureterorenoscopic lithotripsy (URS) and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the treatment of distal ureteral stones. METHODS: The data of all patients with a single distal ureter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[28] Complications such as hematuria, obstruction, renal colic, fever, urinary tract infection, urinoma, hematoma, stone migration, pyelonephritis, urosepsis, ureter damage and avulsion can be seen. [29] Large series studies in the literature demonstrate that the major complication rate of ureteroscopy is less than 0.1%. [30] We observed no major complication in our study; however two patients had transient obstruction in the ureter lumen and four patients had hematuria due to ureteral mucosal damage, and one patient had urinary tract infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[28] Complications such as hematuria, obstruction, renal colic, fever, urinary tract infection, urinoma, hematoma, stone migration, pyelonephritis, urosepsis, ureter damage and avulsion can be seen. [29] Large series studies in the literature demonstrate that the major complication rate of ureteroscopy is less than 0.1%. [30] We observed no major complication in our study; however two patients had transient obstruction in the ureter lumen and four patients had hematuria due to ureteral mucosal damage, and one patient had urinary tract infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%