2021
DOI: 10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.6369
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Upper Elbow Cast and Splint in Type II Supracondylar Humerus Fractures in Pediatric Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to these studies, factors that were identified to predict secondary displacement or influence the decision to perform CRPP are the degree of fracture extension, soft tissue condition, rotational deformity, varus malalignment, valgus malignment, and not using sedation. The details of these studies are shown in Table 4 [4,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13]15,18,[20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to these studies, factors that were identified to predict secondary displacement or influence the decision to perform CRPP are the degree of fracture extension, soft tissue condition, rotational deformity, varus malalignment, valgus malignment, and not using sedation. The details of these studies are shown in Table 4 [4,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13]15,18,[20][21][22][23][24][25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shaft condylar angle (SCA) difference of less than 18° is classified as type IIA [4]. Many surgeons advocated closed reduction (CR) and casting as a treatment for a minimally displaced type II fracture (or type IIA) with good results [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. On the other hand, others preferred CRPP for a more severe type II fracture (or type IIB).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%