2012
DOI: 10.4155/bio.11.289
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Unit Resolution Srm And Tof-Ms At 12,000 Mass Resolution For Quantitative Bioanalysis of 11 Steroids From Human Plasma

Abstract: Although the results show wider linear range and slightly better sensitivity for most of the compounds with QqQ in comparison to TOF, acceptable performance was obtained for most of the compounds within the range of LOD to 2000 ng/ml (in plasma), this was also the case with LC-TOF-MS analysis. The main problem in TOF-MS analysis at 12,000 mass resolution from plasma was selectivity rather than sensitivity or linear range.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The LOD for the individual analyte was determined at the lowest concentration, showing a signal to noise ratio (S/N) superior to 3, and ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 ng/mL (Table 2). The LOQ for the individual analyte was determined at the lowest concentration, showing a signal to noise ratio (S/N) superior to 10, and ranged from 0.3 to 1.7 ng/mL (Table 2), similar to the respective values reported recently [41]. 1.…”
Section: Calibration and Methods Validationsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The LOD for the individual analyte was determined at the lowest concentration, showing a signal to noise ratio (S/N) superior to 3, and ranged from 0.1 to 0.5 ng/mL (Table 2). The LOQ for the individual analyte was determined at the lowest concentration, showing a signal to noise ratio (S/N) superior to 10, and ranged from 0.3 to 1.7 ng/mL (Table 2), similar to the respective values reported recently [41]. 1.…”
Section: Calibration and Methods Validationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…In contrast with QQQ MS systems, the TOF-MS systems have been traditionally used for screening-type analyses rather than fully quantitative work. Recently, TOF-MS technology has gained the advantage of increased applicability for quantitative work, by the increase in the linear (dynamic) range and mass resolution of the instruments [41]. The most used Q-TOF or Orbitrap mass system possess a dynamic range of ≥4 orders of magnitude, a mass resolution of ≥30,000 (full width at half maximum), and a mass accuracy of <5 ppm.…”
Section: Methods Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LLE method is appreciated for its speed and simplicity, while the SPE method can be semi-automated using 96well plates for instance [106]. The quality of the extraction technique used is evaluated by the calculation of the percentage of steroid recovery (% of recovery), precision, and accuracy as well as the matrix effect (%) [108].…”
Section: Methodologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For most analytes, the ULOQ was 400–1000 nM, as indicated by detector saturation in the calibration runs when exceeding this concentration. This low linear range is a typical limitation of time-of-flight analyzers [ 59 ]. The IM stage results in a further accumulation of analytes due to the trapping of ions upstream of the drift tube, which leads to even more pronounced saturation effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%