2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2016.09.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ultrasound imaging and video otoscopy with cross-sectional imaging for the diagnosis of canine otitis media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
7
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of Mal OE/OM in the present study, however, is comparable to reports of OM diagnosed in dogs with undefined, chronic OE using CT 35 and MRI 17 imaging. However, both imaging modalities may fail to diagnose cases of early OM when there are only minor pathological findings in the tympanic cavity 17,36,37 . It is notable that only four of 14 ears judged by the clinician to have Mal OE/OM in this study, based on video‐otoscopy and bulla lavage, had evidence of soft tissue attenuating material in the tympanic bulla on CT imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The frequency of Mal OE/OM in the present study, however, is comparable to reports of OM diagnosed in dogs with undefined, chronic OE using CT 35 and MRI 17 imaging. However, both imaging modalities may fail to diagnose cases of early OM when there are only minor pathological findings in the tympanic cavity 17,36,37 . It is notable that only four of 14 ears judged by the clinician to have Mal OE/OM in this study, based on video‐otoscopy and bulla lavage, had evidence of soft tissue attenuating material in the tympanic bulla on CT imaging.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…OM represents an important perpetuating factor of OE ( Logas, 1994 ). Published prevalence rates range from 32 to 89% of dogs with chronic OE that have concurrent OM ( Belmudes et al., 2018 ; Classen, Bruehschwein, Meyer-Lindenberg & Mueller, 2016 ; Cole, Kwochka, Kowalski & Hillier, 1998 , 2002 ; Doyle, Skelly & Bellenger, 2004 ; Herrmann, 2014 ; Moltzen, 1961 ; Saridomichelakis, Farmaki, Leontides & Koutinas, 2007 ; Spreull, 1964 ; Trower, Gregory, Renfrew & Lamb, 1998 ). Proper diagnostic evaluation will thus lead to a correct diagnosis of OM and will enable an appropriate treatment ( Cole et al., 2002 ; Rose, 1976 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite those precautions, radiography is not considered to be sensitive for the diagnosis of otitis media . Ultrasound imaging has also been evaluated; it can be helpful but should not replace CT for the diagnosis of canine OM because of its lower sensitivity than cross‐sectional imaging, as well as variations due to positioning of the patient and accuracy depending on the sonographer's experience …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Ultrasound imaging has also been evaluated; it can be helpful but should not replace CT for the diagnosis of canine OM because of its lower sensitivity than crosssectional imaging, as well as variations due to positioning of the patient and accuracy depending on the sonographer's experience. 9 Imaging techniques such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are complementary imaging methods that have superior diagnostic value over other imaging modalities. Computed tomography is used to better define bony structures, whereas MRI allows better definition of soft tissue structures (especially inner ear labyrinth fluid and intracranial structures).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%