Comparison of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block and thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery: a randomized controlled non-inferiority clinical trial
Abstract:Background and objectivesThe anesthetic characteristics of ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) remain unclear. We compared the analgesic efficacies of ESPB and thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) for analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).MethodIn this prospective randomized non-inferiority trial, 88 patients undergoing VATS randomly received ESPB or TPVB. All patients received continuous infusion of 0.2% levobupivacaine (8 mL/hour) after injection of a 20 mL 0.2% levobupivacain… Show more
“…There was no case of local anesthetic intoxation occurred in ESPB group in our study, after all, high volume and high concentration of ropivacaine increased the risk of local anesthesia toxicity [14,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…This prospective randomized study showed that a single ESPB provided superior postoperative analgesia than the TPVB in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy, which was different from recent studies. The other three studies all have proved that the analgesic effect of ESPB block is equal to or weaker than that of TPVB [14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…According to the preliminary study (n=10, unpublished data), the mean VAS scores after ESPB and TPVB was 2.1 and 3.6, respectively, and the SD of the VAS scores was 1.6. We defined an acceptable superiority margin as 1, according to the previous study [14]. A sample size of 7 in each group was required to provide a power of 0.8 and a one-sided α of 0.05, given the possibility of missed follow-up rate 10%.…”
Background: Whether ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can replace thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) remains unknown. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of ESPB compared with TPVB for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy under general anesthesia. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial divided patients into a control group, a TPVB group (0.3 mL/kg, 0.5% ropivacaine), and an ESPB group (0.5 mL/kg, 0.5% ropivacaine). Dermatomes with loss of pinprick sensation, were recorded during 30 min after block administration. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, total analgesic dose, and complications after surgery were recorded. Results: Whether at rest or during coughing, the VAS scores were lower in ESPB group at 1, 6, 18, 24, and 48 h after surgery compared with the Control group. VAS scores were similar in the ESPB and TPVB groups at 1 h, but were lower in the ESPB group at 6, 18, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. Conclusions: Single ESPB provided superior postoperative analgesia than TPVB, without causing any adverse effect.
“…There was no case of local anesthetic intoxation occurred in ESPB group in our study, after all, high volume and high concentration of ropivacaine increased the risk of local anesthesia toxicity [14,17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…This prospective randomized study showed that a single ESPB provided superior postoperative analgesia than the TPVB in patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy, which was different from recent studies. The other three studies all have proved that the analgesic effect of ESPB block is equal to or weaker than that of TPVB [14][15][16].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…According to the preliminary study (n=10, unpublished data), the mean VAS scores after ESPB and TPVB was 2.1 and 3.6, respectively, and the SD of the VAS scores was 1.6. We defined an acceptable superiority margin as 1, according to the previous study [14]. A sample size of 7 in each group was required to provide a power of 0.8 and a one-sided α of 0.05, given the possibility of missed follow-up rate 10%.…”
Background: Whether ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB) can replace thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) remains unknown. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of ESPB compared with TPVB for postoperative analgesia after video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy under general anesthesia. Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial divided patients into a control group, a TPVB group (0.3 mL/kg, 0.5% ropivacaine), and an ESPB group (0.5 mL/kg, 0.5% ropivacaine). Dermatomes with loss of pinprick sensation, were recorded during 30 min after block administration. Visual analog scale (VAS) scores, total analgesic dose, and complications after surgery were recorded. Results: Whether at rest or during coughing, the VAS scores were lower in ESPB group at 1, 6, 18, 24, and 48 h after surgery compared with the Control group. VAS scores were similar in the ESPB and TPVB groups at 1 h, but were lower in the ESPB group at 6, 18, 24, and 48 h postoperatively. Conclusions: Single ESPB provided superior postoperative analgesia than TPVB, without causing any adverse effect.
“…Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel inter-fascial plane block rst introduced by Forero et al in 2016 [6], providing wide-ranging analgesia in lung surgery [7][8][9], laparoscopy [10], mastectomy [11] and pediatric surgery [12,13]. The proposed mechanism of ESPB is that distribution of local anesthetic solution spreads into the paravertebral space and epidural space [14], which then blocks the dorsal, ventral, and tra c branches of spinal nerve.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paravertebral block is deemed as a premium alternative to epidural block, has been used for many years in various kinds of surgery due to its de nite analgesia [31]. Most of the recent studies have compared ESPB with intravenous analgesia, however, there is still lack of study comparing ESPB with TPVB except Taketa and colleagues' work [32]. What's more, the mechanism by which ESPB works through paravertebral space remains con icting [15].…”
Introduction: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a novel inter-fascial plane block, which is applied more and more in postoperative pain control, especially in chest surgery. Attention is increasingly paid to its premium analgesia in urological surgery. Therefore, we aimed to explore whether ESPB would have similar analgesia compared with thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in laparoscopic nephroureterectomy surgery.Methods and analysis: This prospective, randomized, double-blinded, non-inferiority trial will enroll 166 patients undergoing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy. Participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 into receiving ESPB or TPVB before surgery. Both ultrasound-guided ESPB or TPVB will be performed with an injection of 0.375% ropivacaine 0.4ml/kg before anesthesia induction. Standardized patients controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) will be applied for each patient. The primary endpoint is the joint of cumulative 24h opioid (sufentanil) consumption and average pain score via numeric rating scale (NRS) at 24th h after surgery. Secondary endpoints include rescued analgesic demand, cumulative opioid consumption and pain NRS scores at different preset timepoint within 48h after surgery. Other predefined outcomes include clinical features of blockage, quality of recovery, subjective sleep quality, time to ambulation and flatus, and adverse events, as well as length of stay in hospital and anesthesia cost. Discussion: Previous studies investigating the analgesic efficacy of ESPB only concentrated on a single endpoint for postoperative pain evaluation, while studies focusing on the direct comparation between ESPB and TPVB in urological surgery is still lacking. Our study is the first trial in non-inferiority design of comparing ESPB and TPVB in patient undergoing laparoscopic nephroureterectomy surgery, and the primary outcome is the joint endpoint of opioid consumption and pain NRS score.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR 2000031916. Registered on 14 April 2020. http://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.aspx?proj=50782
Analgesia for first rib resection can be challenging with short-and long-term consequences for patients such as acute distress, difficulty participating in physiotherapy and chronic pain. We report utilising an erector spinae plane block with a continuous infusion catheter as analgesia for a transaxillary first rib removal in a patient with venous thoracic outlet syndrome (Paget-Schroetter syndrome). We could find no reports of erector spinae plane block in transaxillary rib resection, and a limited number of reports using a paravertebral approach to analgesia for this procedure. In our case, an erector spinae plane block provided effective analgesia, allowing the patient to participate freely in postoperative physiotherapy; no complications of erector spinae plane block were encountered. Further research into the safety and efficacy of erector spinae plane block for first rib resection is warranted.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.