Comparison of Ultrafine Powder Pellet and Flux‐free Fusion Glass for Bulk Analysis of Granitoids by Laser Ablation‐Inductively Coupled Plasma‐Mass Spectrometry

Abstract

Two sample preparation techniques (ultrafine powder pellet and flux‐free fusion glass) for LA‐ICP‐MS bulk analysis of granitoids were compared. Ultrafine powder particles produced by wet milling were characterised as d50: ~ 1.0 μm, d90: ~ 5.0 μm. Agate abrasion (balls and vial) during wet milling affects only SiO2 measurements and is negligible for other elements. For the flux‐free fusion glass, a second grinding of the initial fused glass and re‐melting were necessary to produce compositionally homogeneous glasses. Nickel and Cu can be contaminated during the fusion procedure, and Sn and Pb were depleted after the melting process. The homogeneity of fusion glasses was comparable to that of MPI‐DING glasses, while the powder pellets were less homogeneous. This heterogeneity is ascribed to large (up to 10 μm) crystal fragments (e.g., biotite) persisting in powders even after 45 min of milling. For most elements of interest, both preparation techniques give reliable LA‐ICP‐MS results of granitoid reference materials within 10% of the reference values. Thus, we can recommend both techniques to avoid common problems associated with acid dissolution ICP‐MS. For high‐precision measurements (especially Zr, Hf, Th and U), the flux‐free fusion glass technique is a better choice than ultrafine powder pellets.

Generation of Archaean TTG Gneisses Through Amphibole‐Dominated Fractionation

“…A more detailed discussion of the analytical methods can be found in the supporting information (Bouvier et al, ; Elhlou et al, ; Griffin et al, ; Griffin et al, ; Griffin et al, ; Hamilton et al, ; Jacobsen & Wasserburg, ; Li et al, ; Li, Li, Li, Guo, Li, Feng, et al, ; Li, Li, Li, Guo, Li, & Yang, ; Li et al, ; Liu et al, ; Liu et al, ; Ludwig, ; Sláma et al, ; Söderlund et al, ; Stacey & Kramers, ; Wiedenbeck et al, ; Woodhead et al, ; Woodhead & Hergt, ; Wu et al, ; Wu et al, ; Xie et al, ).…”

Further Characterization of the RW-1 Monazite: A New Working Reference Material for Oxygen and Neodymium Isotopic Microanalysis

“…Procedures were similar to those described by Wu et al [26] with isotopes measured in peak hopping mode with a laser beam diameter of 24 µm, pulse repetition rate of 3 Hz, beam flux of 5 J/cm 2 , acquisition times of~20 s for background and 40 s for sample data, and a He-Ar carrier gas. Trace element concentrations were calibrated against National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Standard Reference Material (SRM) 610 as an external reference material.…”

NanoSr – A New Carbonate Microanalytical Reference Material for In Situ Strontium Isotope Analysis

“…Recent progress in the synthetic production of custom‐made materials and further processing of established RMs enables the geochemical community to design very specific materials of different compositions and by different techniques (Tabersky et al , Garbe‐Schönberg and Müller , Bao et al , Wu et al , Jochum et al ). One possibility is the flame spray technique, which allows production of materials with a nanoscale grain size and a customised composition and matrix for different applications.…”