2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ab.2010.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of ultrafiltration units for proteomic and N-glycoproteomic analysis by the filter-aided sample preparation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
157
3
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 166 publications
(163 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
157
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this method, molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) filters were used to remove any detergents and salts used for the affinity purification, which allows the flexible use of detergents and buffers without interfering with subsequent MS analyses. In the current protocol, the key features modified with respect to the previously published methods (26,27) include the use of trifluoroethanol (TFE) in addition to urea for solublization of the protein samples and the substitution of Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) for DTT in protein reduction. The use of TFE in place of or in addition to urea alone results in improved protein coverage by LC-MS in this experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this method, molecular weight cutoff (MWCO) filters were used to remove any detergents and salts used for the affinity purification, which allows the flexible use of detergents and buffers without interfering with subsequent MS analyses. In the current protocol, the key features modified with respect to the previously published methods (26,27) include the use of trifluoroethanol (TFE) in addition to urea for solublization of the protein samples and the substitution of Tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP) for DTT in protein reduction. The use of TFE in place of or in addition to urea alone results in improved protein coverage by LC-MS in this experiment.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To prepare samples for MS, the eluent samples from Csy4* affinity purification were rinsed twice in 8 M urea using MWCO filters, followed by the addition of 40% TFE for efficient denaturation of the target proteins, allowing the effective removal even of detergents with low critical micelle concentrations, such as Triton X-100 (27). After the reduction of disulfide bonds between cysteine residues with TCEP and alkylation of free thiol groups with iodoacetamide to prevent disulfide bond formation during downstream peptide mapping by MS, the proteins were digested in two steps with endoproteinase LysC and then with trypsin.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supernatants were diluted with buffer UA (8 M urea, 0.1 M Tris/HCl pH ϭ 8.5) to a final concentration of 0.5% SDS. Proteins were digested with the endoproteinase LysC following the protocol for filter aided sample preparation (18). Briefly, protein extracts were loaded on a 30k Amicon Ultra filter unit (Millipore, Billerica, MA) by means of centrifugation at 14,000g.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Suc gradient was fractionated, and protein concentrations of peak fractions of LHCII monomers, LHCII trimers, PSII core complexes, PSI-LHCI, PSII-LHCII, and supercomplexes were determined using the Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Samples were tryptically digested in 0.5-mL Amicon Ultra ultrafiltration devices (30-kD cutoff; Millipore) according to the FASP method (Wi sniewski et al, 2009(Wi sniewski et al, , 2011 with minor modifications. Proteins were reduced with 100 mM dithiothreitol in 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.5) and 8 M urea (UA) at room temperature for 30 min.…”
Section: Tryptic Digestion Of Thylakoid Membrane Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%