2018
DOI: 10.3133/sir20185021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of U.S. Geological Survey and Bureau of Reclamation water-use reporting in the Colorado River Basin

Abstract: For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment-visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1-888-ASK-USGS.For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov.Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government.Although this information product, for the most part, is in the pub… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, failure to properly account for total water use may mean that current actual water use is already on an upward trend—consistent with our earlier example. The MDBA could learn from experiences in the Colorado River Basin where field surveys and mapping, remote sensing, and return flow calculations are used to account for water use and returns (see Bruce et al, 2019). However, an exploration of the economic incentives behind illegal resource extractions—and the relevance of effective enforcement—underpins the broader policy design and implementation discussion above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, failure to properly account for total water use may mean that current actual water use is already on an upward trend—consistent with our earlier example. The MDBA could learn from experiences in the Colorado River Basin where field surveys and mapping, remote sensing, and return flow calculations are used to account for water use and returns (see Bruce et al, 2019). However, an exploration of the economic incentives behind illegal resource extractions—and the relevance of effective enforcement—underpins the broader policy design and implementation discussion above.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Consumptive uses are those reported by Reclamation in Colorado River System Consumptive Uses and Losses Reports, Upper Colorado River Basin Consumptive Uses and Losses Reports, and Colorado River Accounting and Water Use (Arizona, California, and Nevada) Reports, all available at https://www.usbr.gov/uc/envdocs/plans.html or https://www.usbr.gov/lc/region/g4000/wtracct.html. Agricultural consumptive use is calculated by Reclamation as diversions minus return flows (Bruce et al, 2018). Lower Basin uses do not include those in Colorado River tributaries. …”
Section: Who Uses the Water And Where?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Neither dataset includes evaporation calculations. It should be noted that there are several different methods of calculating consumptive use of water and that the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation's calculations, on which these numbers are based, are not uniformly accepted by the Colorado River Basin States [31]. )…”
Section: Recent Hydrologic Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%