2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2005.02.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two video-imaging instruments for measuring volumetric shrinkage of dental resin composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
29
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, no investigations have been undertaken for a thorough, comprehensive comparison on fluidity and polymerization shrinkage between conventional composites and the recently available flowable composites. Further, with regard to measuring the polymerization shrinkage of the highly fluid paste of flowable composite resins, there is an obvious impending need for a new measurement method beyond the traditional ones [8][9][10] . In this study, a highly accurate laser displacement meter was utilized to measure the polymerization shrinkage of highly fluid flowable composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, no investigations have been undertaken for a thorough, comprehensive comparison on fluidity and polymerization shrinkage between conventional composites and the recently available flowable composites. Further, with regard to measuring the polymerization shrinkage of the highly fluid paste of flowable composite resins, there is an obvious impending need for a new measurement method beyond the traditional ones [8][9][10] . In this study, a highly accurate laser displacement meter was utilized to measure the polymerization shrinkage of highly fluid flowable composites.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique has been shown to yield results comparable to those observed using mercury dilatometry 15 and drop-shape analysis. 16 Polymerization shrinkage has been an inherent deficiency with resin composites over the years, despite improvements in mechanical properties, and it can contribute to gap formation at the margins of restorations. The current goal of the manufacturers of resin composite restorative materials remains improvement or elimination of contraction stress-possibly through low or non-shrinking monomers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Filler loading can be deceiving, however, because it may not be indicative of the presence of pre-polymerized filler particles. 16 With the use of pre-polymerized filler particles, resin composites typically benefit by having lower polymerization shrinkage, as found with Durafill VS and Premise. However, in the current study, it was interesting to note that Gradia Direct Posterior did not benefit from their incorporation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods have been reported for evaluating polymerization shrinkage of resin composites, such as mercury dilatometer 16,21) , bonded disk method 22,23) , optical method 24,25) , use of the strain gauge 26) , liner shrinkage [27][28][29] etc. Monteiro et al compared the polymerization shrinkage of resin composites using three different methods; coordinate measuring machine (CMM), optical coherence tomography (OCT) and Archimedes' principle 30) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aqueous solution of sodium lauryl sulfate, a surfaceactive agent, was used as the buoyancy medium in this study. The adherence of air bubbles to the samples, which can cause incorrect measurements, was avoided by using sodium lauryl sulfate 25,30,31) . It revealed that the polymerization shrinkage of BBS was effectively reduced.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%