1978
DOI: 10.1016/0003-2697(78)90448-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two ultracentrifugation procedures for separation of nonhuman primate lipoproteins

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Isolation and Acetylation of LDL LDL was isolated from fresh human serum by sequential gradient ultracentrifugation [45]. Afterwards LDL was dialyzed for 24 h at 4°C against a buffer containing 0.15 mol/L NaCl and 0.3 mmol/L EDTA, pH 7.4.…”
Section: Fatty Acid Analysis Of Cell Total Lipidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Isolation and Acetylation of LDL LDL was isolated from fresh human serum by sequential gradient ultracentrifugation [45]. Afterwards LDL was dialyzed for 24 h at 4°C against a buffer containing 0.15 mol/L NaCl and 0.3 mmol/L EDTA, pH 7.4.…”
Section: Fatty Acid Analysis Of Cell Total Lipidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Density gradient ultracentrifugation has long been the gold standard for separation, identification, and quantification of lipoproteins. Ultracentrifugal methods separate lipoproteins based on their hydrated densities. The different forms of this technique include rate zonal ultracentrifugation and isopycnic separations. , Each of these techniques has specific advantages and disadvantages including the accuracy of the separation, use in fraction preparation, and the extent of skill needed to perform these techniques.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%