2012
DOI: 10.1109/tmag.2012.2198447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Ultra-Fast Actuator Concepts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
51
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
51
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Where, B is the friction coefficient, k is spring constant (of bistable assembly), m is the weight of the moving part, and F is the electromagnetic force generated by the Thomson Coils (TC) [13], [14].…”
Section: B Contact Separation Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where, B is the friction coefficient, k is spring constant (of bistable assembly), m is the weight of the moving part, and F is the electromagnetic force generated by the Thomson Coils (TC) [13], [14].…”
Section: B Contact Separation Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LPEC are used in many branches of science and technology as electromechanical accelerators and shock-power devices [1][2][3][4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, in [2], a comparative analysis of the LPEC with EA and CA is considered, and in [7] -LPEC with EA and with FA. In these works only electromechanical characteristics of the LPEC are considered, without considering the reliability of the design of the armature, the magnetic scattering fields, the interconnected electric, force, speed and mobile armature parameters and the presence of external FS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ECEs of the DSC actuators are a bit higher than the ECEs of the TC. 9 The DSC actuator comprises a static and a movable coil connected in series, Figure 1 shows a typical configuration of the DSC actuator used in the medium voltage vacuum switches. The same current flows through the static and the moving coil in different directions, thus the axial magnetic flux densities generated by the coils cancel each other out, while the radial magnetic flux built by the coils reinforces each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,[12][13][14][15][16][17] The former is with relatively low accuracy, but easier to be used in the optimal design, the latter is considered more accurate, but not so easy to be used in concert with the optimization design method. The FEM computation is usually considered as a verification tool as a supplementary of the prototype tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%