1994
DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(94)90745-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two strategies for myocardial management during coronary artery operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was our aim in the present study to compare the extent of myocardial damage associated with these two techniques using cardiac troponin T,13 17 18 a specific marker with negligible cross reactivity with skeletal muscle 10. In addition, we aimed to increase the sensitivity of this method still further by estimating cardiac troponin T in both coronary sinus and peripheral artery, so that myocardial release could be detected 7…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was our aim in the present study to compare the extent of myocardial damage associated with these two techniques using cardiac troponin T,13 17 18 a specific marker with negligible cross reactivity with skeletal muscle 10. In addition, we aimed to increase the sensitivity of this method still further by estimating cardiac troponin T in both coronary sinus and peripheral artery, so that myocardial release could be detected 7…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, several randomised clinical studies have shown that intermittent aortic cross clamping provides protection that is equivalent to, if not better than, blood cardioplegia and preserves LV diastolic function better. [15][16][17][18] We and others have previously shown the safety and efficacy of these methods, even in higher risk patients, possibly because during the operation the myocardium is continuously perfused with the patient's unaltered blood. 8 19-21 The use of off-pump coronary bypass in this subgroup of patients has recently been studied with respect to early outcomes.…”
Section: 7 9 11mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since 1982, there have been a number of clinical trials comparing cardioplegia with ischemic arrest in a prospective randomized manner. 3,4,[9][10][11][12] None showed significant superiority of cardioplegia over intermittent ischemic fibrillatory arrest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%