2000
DOI: 10.1183/09031936.00.15118100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two standardized methods of methacholine inhalation challenge in young adults

Abstract: In the European Community Respiratory Health Study (ECRHS), airway responsiveness to methacholine was determined using the Mefar dosimeter protocol. Elsewhere, the 2-min tidal breathing method has become the preferred standardized method. The relationship between measurements of responsiveness by these two methods is not well established.This study measured airway responsiveness to methacholine by dosimeter and tidal breathing methods in 47 healthy asthmatic subjects aged 20±44 yrs. Tests were performed within… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two methods seem to be equivalent. 18 All participants had complete data and we needed to eliminate only one subject from the analyses. There were proportionally more women than men in the study as it was more difficult to find men and to obtain their consent for the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two methods seem to be equivalent. 18 All participants had complete data and we needed to eliminate only one subject from the analyses. There were proportionally more women than men in the study as it was more difficult to find men and to obtain their consent for the study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the variety of devices used, the delivery of different methacholine doses, the small sample size and the inability to directly compare cutoffs (comparing PC 20 of the tidal breathing to PD 20 of the dosimeter) may have an impact on the overall agreement and limit what could be concluded. 16,25,26 There is emerging evidence that to better compare MCT methods, PD 20 were not due to a changing referral pattern. Furthermore, we do not have information on the technical perfomace such as the nebulizer output and the mass median diameter (MMD) were constant over the time period of each test and the study period.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methacholine solutions, diluted in 0.9% saline and sterilised, were prepared by the study pharmacist in doubling concentrations from 0.03-256 mg?mL , using the methodology established by JUNIPER et al [16] and SIERSTED et al [18]. Starting concentrations of methacholine (0.03-0.125 mg?mL -1 ) were determined by the investigator for each patient, based on inhaled corticosteroid therapy and the response to 0.9% sterile saline.…”
Section: Methacholine Challengementioning
confidence: 99%