2021 2nd International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET) 2021
DOI: 10.1109/incet51464.2021.9456164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two SLAM Algorithms Provided by ROS (Robot Operating System)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the experiment, the charging piles and the robot can communicate with each other. In the real-world scenario, such a configuration can be easily established using ROS [35] (robot operating system), which provides the communication between robots. We tested the model and algorithm in five different tests.…”
Section: Simulation Experiments and Discussion Figure 7 Experimental ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the experiment, the charging piles and the robot can communicate with each other. In the real-world scenario, such a configuration can be easily established using ROS [35] (robot operating system), which provides the communication between robots. We tested the model and algorithm in five different tests.…”
Section: Simulation Experiments and Discussion Figure 7 Experimental ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, utilising open-source platforms such as ROS is common in the development of SLAM algorithms [7]. Studies such as [10,11,32,33] investigate into various SLAM algorithms available in ROS, assessing their performance metrics. For instance, [10] evaluates GMapping, Hector SLAM, and Karto SLAM using benchmark datasets, while [11] and [33] employ the structural similarity index measure (SSIM) to gauge map similarity and CPU efficiency.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies such as [10,11,32,33] investigate into various SLAM algorithms available in ROS, assessing their performance metrics. For instance, [10] evaluates GMapping, Hector SLAM, and Karto SLAM using benchmark datasets, while [11] and [33] employ the structural similarity index measure (SSIM) to gauge map similarity and CPU efficiency. Notably, research indicates that Karto SLAM consistently demonstrates superior performance in terms of mapping accuracy and CPU efficiency [10][11].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In literature (Olalekan et al 2021), the researchers made a comparative study of two SLAM methods available in ROS environment, i.e. GMapping and HectorSLAM.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%