2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nut.2004.01.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two nutrition assessment techniques in hospitalized patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
2
11

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 86 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
47
2
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Mariana RASLAN 1,2 Maria Cristina GONZALEZ 3 Maria Carolina Gonçalves DIAS 4 Fábio Colagrossi PAES-BARBOSA …”
Section: Applicability Of Nutritional Screening Methods In Hospitalizmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mariana RASLAN 1,2 Maria Cristina GONZALEZ 3 Maria Carolina Gonçalves DIAS 4 Fábio Colagrossi PAES-BARBOSA …”
Section: Applicability Of Nutritional Screening Methods In Hospitalizmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Além disso, inclui a organização e a avaliação das informações coletadas para elaboração do plano de terapia nutricional. É composta de questionamentos sobre história médica, nutricional e medicamentosa, exames físicos, medidas antropométricas e exames laboratoriais 2,17 .…”
Section: Avaliação Nutricionalunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, literature diverges on what is considered the gold standard among these various methods. Some studies indicate that the SGA has greater sensitivity for identifying patients at nutritional risk (9) , others suggest the use of the NRS (17,19) or the NRI (27,37) to reflect the risk of malnutrition regardless of the severity of the disease, and still others claim that the v. 49 -no.1 -jan./mar. 2012 biochemical and anthropometric markers are good predictors of nutritional status in hospitalized patients (3,29,39) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This rate was 27 % in the study Oguz and his friends conducted, and 29.8 % in the study Yaris and his friends conducted and it was seen that this rate was rose to 38.3 % during the treatment [19][20][21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%