Soil Biological Communities and Ecosystem Resilience 2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-63336-7_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Molecular Methods to Assess Soil Microbial Diversity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, as regards the species that can be involved in PCB transformation, among α-(e.g., Spingomonas), β-(e.g., Burkholderia, Alcaligenes, Achromobacter, Comamonas, Ralstonia), and γ-Proteobacteria (e.g., Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter), there are species reported to be able to degrade PCBs [74,75]. In some cases, the apparent discrepancy between the ELFA and FISH data for Gram-positive Bacteria was presumably because the FISH technique detects active bacteria with an adequate number of ribosomes [39,40], while the ELFA one produces a phenotypic fingerprinting of microbial communities, whatever their activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, as regards the species that can be involved in PCB transformation, among α-(e.g., Spingomonas), β-(e.g., Burkholderia, Alcaligenes, Achromobacter, Comamonas, Ralstonia), and γ-Proteobacteria (e.g., Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter), there are species reported to be able to degrade PCBs [74,75]. In some cases, the apparent discrepancy between the ELFA and FISH data for Gram-positive Bacteria was presumably because the FISH technique detects active bacteria with an adequate number of ribosomes [39,40], while the ELFA one produces a phenotypic fingerprinting of microbial communities, whatever their activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) method was used for identifying under the epifluorescence microscope the structure of the active microbial community [32,39,40]. FISH was applied on fixed soil sub-samples (1 g), from each replicate microcosm, following the procedure described in detail in Barra Caracciolo et al [41].…”
Section: Microbial Community Structure Assessed By Fishmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To study the population structures and dynamics of microbial communities, genetic fingerprinting techniques such as Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis (DGGE) were developed (Muyzer et al, 1993 ). Nowadays, DGGE can be used as a first approach to visualize main differences in a given microbial community and subsequently high-throughput sequencing (HTS) can be applied to have a deeper understanding of the microbiota composition (Di Lenola et al, 2017 ; Proença et al, 2017a ). This methodology has been implemented in different fields and it is very common in soil microbiology studies (Bevivino et al, 2014 ; Ng et al, 2014 ), or to assess the aboveground microbial structure of trees (e.g., maritime pine, Pinus pinaster Ait.)…”
Section: Methodological Approaches To Unravel the Composition And Funmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) technique assesses the structure of the active microbial community in soil . FISH was applied to soil samples collected at day 900 after poplar planting, in order to identify firstly Archaea and Bacteria .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) technique assesses the structure of the active microbial community in soil. 60 FISH was applied to soil samples collected at day 900 after poplar planting, in order to identify firstly Archaea and Bacteria. Soil sub-samples (1 g) were collected from each contaminated plot (P2, P3 and P4) from the rhizosphere and bulk soil (D soil) and transferred to a test tube containing the fixing solution 56 in order to measure microbial abundance.…”
Section: Microbial Structure and Composition By Fishmentioning
confidence: 99%