2017
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-017-5248-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two Minkowski-space approaches to heavy quarkonia

Abstract: In this work we compare mass spectra and decay constants obtained from two recent, independent, and fully relativistic approaches to the quarkonium bound-state problem: the Basis Light-Front Quantization approach, where light-front wave functions are naturally formulated; and, the Covariant Spectator Theory (CST), based on a reorganization of the Bethe-Salpeter equation. Even though conceptually different, both solutions are obtained in Minkowski space. Comparisons of decay constants for more than ten states o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

5
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
(112 reference statements)
3
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The spectrum agrees with the PDG data with an r.m.s mass deviation of 30 to 40 MeV for states below the open flavor thresholds. The LFWFs have been used to produce several observables and are in reasonable agreement with experiments and other theoretical approaches [32]. We now use these same LFWFs to calculate radiative transitions with the formalism described in Sec.…”
Section: Calculation In Basis Light-front Quantizationsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The spectrum agrees with the PDG data with an r.m.s mass deviation of 30 to 40 MeV for states below the open flavor thresholds. The LFWFs have been used to produce several observables and are in reasonable agreement with experiments and other theoretical approaches [32]. We now use these same LFWFs to calculate radiative transitions with the formalism described in Sec.…”
Section: Calculation In Basis Light-front Quantizationsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…See also Refs. [71][72][73][74][75] for some recent works bridging other approaches with the light-front approach.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, a lot of experimental information has been gathered on the bottomonium spectrum during the last years thanks to ATLAS, BaBar, Belle, BESIII, CLEO, CMS, D0, and LHCb collaborations [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] and further results are expected in the near future during the Belle II run [13,14] and after the CMS and LHCb upgrades [15,16]. Theory work has preceded and followed through the experimental a e-mail: djmolinab@unal.edu.co (corresponding author) b e-mail: mdesanctis@unal.edu.co c e-mail: cesar.fernandez@nucleares.unam.mx d e-mail: santopinto@ge.infn.it effort [17][18][19][20][21] in the form of Lattice QCD computations [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33], Dyson-Schwinger-Bethe-Salpeter equations [34][35][36][37][38][39][40], effectives Hamiltonians reduced from QCD [41,42] and potential quark models [43][44]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%