2013
DOI: 10.1590/s0100-736x2013000200021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two methods of tear sampling for protein quantification by Bradford method

Abstract: esquerdo, respectivamente. Para as amostras obtidas com STT os resultados foram 4,45mg/mL ±0,35 and 4,52mg/ mL ±0,29 para olhos direito e esquerdo, respectivamente. Diferenças estatisticamente significativas (p<0,001) foram encontradas entre os dois métodos. Nas condições em que o trabalho foi conduzido, a média da concentração proteica pelo método de Bradford das amostras obtidas através das tiras do STT foi superior à obtida com o tubo microcapilar. Os valores padrão da concentração protéica da lágrima obtid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(37 reference statements)
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A tear sample was collected with a microcapillary tube inserted in the lower eyelid of both eyes . Temperature and relative humidity of the air were recorded at the time of collection of each sample, using a thermohygrometer (Incoterm, model 7666.02.0.00).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A tear sample was collected with a microcapillary tube inserted in the lower eyelid of both eyes . Temperature and relative humidity of the air were recorded at the time of collection of each sample, using a thermohygrometer (Incoterm, model 7666.02.0.00).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A microcapillary glass tube (1-10 µl) placed in contact with the inferior lacrimal lake is the most commonly reported technique to collect tear fluid. This method directly samples tear fluid by capillary action and is extensively described in humans, 182,216,220,[226][227][228][229][230][231][232][233][234][235][236][237][238][239] dogs, 183,191,[240][241][242][243] rabbits, 188,237,238,241,244 mice, 245,246 and rats. 183,202,237,247 Other direct techniques (seldom reported) involve micropipettes, 248 polypropylene tubing, 183 or polytetrafluoroethylene tubing.…”
Section: Direct Tear Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…41 cellulose filter paper and possess specific characteristics to promote tolerance (5-mm width × 35-mm length, 0.22-mm thick, 20-25 µm porosity, foldable extremity for ease of insertion). 249,257 In addition to their conventional use for aqueous tear assessment, Schirmer strips can retrieve tear fluid for bioanalytical purposes in humans, 182,216,219,220,228,231,258 dogs, 190,209,211,214,215,240,259 and small laboratory species. 244,260,261 For instance, Schirmer strips were used for indepth characterization of proteomics in human 173 and canine tears, 190 and can also successfully recover specific analytes such as cytokines, 200,258 clusterin, 182 and xenobiotics.…”
Section: Indirect Tear Samplingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported that total tear protein concentration obtained by Schirmer's strip is much higher than that with the capillary method. 42 In practical experience, sampling by strip was rapid, reliable, and without any risk to the subjects. On the other hand, the capillary tube method requires a greater precision and skill.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%