2018
DOI: 10.1002/mop.31235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two matching techniques for UHF RFID tags

Abstract: respectively. In the Figure 8A,B, the simulation results for S 11 and S 41 are 44.1 and 37.6 dB and the measurement results for S 11 and S 41 are 42.9 and 36.6 dB, respectively. Table 5 shows the is on for comparison for dimension size of the proposed HBC and other HBCs. In the table, the proposed HBC size is reduced the 83% then conventional HBC (see Figure 1). 1,10,11 | C ONCL US I ONIn general, the kg/4 transmission-line (TL) is used for HBC in the microwave system. The dimension size of the conventional kg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reading range of the proposed tag is measured with 5° rotation along the axis. To corroborate the measured results, the read range of the tag is calculated theoretically with Friss equation 17 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reading range of the proposed tag is measured with 5° rotation along the axis. To corroborate the measured results, the read range of the tag is calculated theoretically with Friss equation 17 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Several design approaches have already been discussed for impedance matching and size reduction of RFID tags, which include T‐Matching, 13‐15 inductively coupled loop, 16 and meander line antennas. For instance, the inductive coupling technique improves impedance matching of a tag antenna with little effect on the radiation efficiency 17 . Similarly, the T‐matching technique 18 achieves a broadband matching, reduced size, and improved efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The calculated value of R rad is found to be 7.05 Ω. The capacitance of the radiating element, C rad and inductance of the radiating element, L rad , can be derived using Crad=12πf02Lrad and Lrad=QantRrad2πf0, where Q ant is the quality factor of antenna and can be approximated from the simulated reactance ( X in ) slope of the tag antenna in CST Microwave Studio as defined in Reference 28, 29 using Qant=f02RraddXindff=f0, where f 0 is the center frequency of the tag antenna, df = f 2 − f 1 , dX in = X in ( f 2 ) − X in ( f 1 ). The computed values of C rad and L rad are 1.85 pF and 16.308 nH respectively.…”
Section: Equivalent Circuit Analysis Of Proposed Rfid Tag Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equivalent circuit of proposed RFID tag shown in Figure . Can be further simplified using equivalent T model of transformer described in Reference 28, shown in Figure .Where Lloop=LloopM = 28.54 nH and Lrad=LradM =13.99 nH respectively. To compute the input impedance, Z in , using various derived parameters (Rloop,Lloop,0.25emRrad,Lrad, C rad , M ), equivalent T model is realized using ADS software.…”
Section: Equivalent Circuit Analysis Of Proposed Rfid Tag Antennamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, various techniques have been reported to achieve the aforementioned specifications. For instance, the inductive coupling technique improves impedance matching of a tag antenna; however, it compromises radiation efficiency [8]. Similarly, the T-matching technique [2,9] achieves broadband matching, reduced size, and improved efficiency, but the designs [10,11] do not consider the effect of magnetic locks on the cloth tags.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%