2001
DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0668.2001.011003192.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two-Level and Three-Level Classifications of Moisture-Damaged Dwellings in Relation to Health Effects

Abstract: A total of 630 randomly selected dwellings were surveyed for visible signs of moisture damage by civil engineers, and questionnaire responses were collected from the occupants (a total of 1,017 adults) to analyse the association between moisture damage and occupant health. A three-level grading system was developed, which took into account the number of damage sites in buildings and estimated the severity of the damage. In the present study, this grading system was tested as an improved model of moisture damag… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several investigators reported that signs of dampness were related to symptoms in dwellings (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). We also reported that signs of dampness related to symptoms in Japanese newly built dwellings (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Several investigators reported that signs of dampness were related to symptoms in dwellings (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10). We also reported that signs of dampness related to symptoms in Japanese newly built dwellings (11).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…While associations between observed water damage or mold and adverse respiratory health effects have been consistently reported in residences (Bornehag et al 2001;Haverinen et al 2001), less research has been reported for such associations in adult workers in buildings such as offices.…”
Section: Comparison To Findings Of Othersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For instance, Karvonen et al (2009) and (2015) included room-specific D/M assessments to a greater degree than did Pekkanen et al (2007). Haverinen et al (2001) did not consider room location or size of the moisture damage. Park et al (2004) constructed individualized exposure indices weighted by the time each subject spent in each room, the most complex semi-quantitative D/M indices yet reported, based on visual and olfactory observation by room for water stains, visible mold, mold odor, and moisture (with continuous rather than just several values).…”
Section: Exposure Metricmentioning
confidence: 99%