2006
DOI: 10.1007/11736639_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Learning Models for Collaborative e-Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The importance of learner-learner and/or learner-teacher interactions for promoting selfconfidence is also noted. For example, computer-supported collaboration enables learners to appreciate dialogue as an important resource in learning (Jakobsson 2006;Park and Hyun 2006).…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Development Of Self-confidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of learner-learner and/or learner-teacher interactions for promoting selfconfidence is also noted. For example, computer-supported collaboration enables learners to appreciate dialogue as an important resource in learning (Jakobsson 2006;Park and Hyun 2006).…”
Section: Factors Influencing the Development Of Self-confidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, students and teachers were asked for information on student work and features in questionnaires or reports (Collazos et al 2007;Soller 2001;Park and Hyun 2006;Meier et al 2007;Kahrimanis et al 2009). On the other hand, student interactions were stored to model their collaboration.…”
Section: Key Modeling Issues In Collaborative Learning Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Soller (2001) proposed a Collaborative Learning Model where a set of indicators described effective collaboration in an educational setting (participation, basic social knowledge, discussions on active learning, development analysis and processing groups, and interaction promotion). Park and Hyun (2006) encouraged students to evaluate their peers (team) and themselves using the following indicators: interaction, "collaborativity", and accountability. This "collaborativity" represented the group's activities to achieve the team's learning objectives.…”
Section: Key Modeling Issues In Collaborative Learning Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation