2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Inverse Filtering Methods in Parameterization of the Glottal Closing Phase Characteristics in Different Phonation Types

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It requires a manual setting of two input parameters: the number of concatenating segments to model the form of the vocal tract and the lip radiation factor. This algorithm showed a performance comparable to that of a well established manual method [Lehto et al, 2007]. A publically-available Matlab package called TKK Aparat by Matti Airas [2008] that implements IAIF offered us a platform for further development.…”
Section: Parametrisationmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It requires a manual setting of two input parameters: the number of concatenating segments to model the form of the vocal tract and the lip radiation factor. This algorithm showed a performance comparable to that of a well established manual method [Lehto et al, 2007]. A publically-available Matlab package called TKK Aparat by Matti Airas [2008] that implements IAIF offered us a platform for further development.…”
Section: Parametrisationmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…A number of publications dedicated to detection of pressed and breathy phonation modes (mostly in speech) employed descriptors derived from the glottal flow waveform such as amplitude quotient (AQ), normalised amplitude quotient (NAQ) and the difference between the first two harmonics (H1-H2) [Walker and Murphy 2007, Orr et al 2003, Drugman et al 2008, Lehto et al 2007, Sundberg et al 2004. These descriptors are considered particularly suitable for glottal flow waveform estimation because they are relatively robust to some estimation errors.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the following selection criteria were adopted: the best estimate was the one that showed the maximally flat closed phase for the glottal flow waveform and a minimal remaining formant ripple. These criteria have been widely used in previous glottal inverse filtering studies [e.g., [79][80][81]]. After (Adapted from [82]).…”
Section: Inverse Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glottal characteristics of laryngeal speech have been heavily studied [1,13,14,15,16]. Aerodynamic parameters calculated from the inverse-filtered waveforms such as open quotient (OQ), speed quotient (SQ), and area under the curve (AUC) have been used to conveniently describe the vibratory glottal cycle and quantify voice quality [12,14,15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aerodynamic parameters calculated from the inverse-filtered waveforms such as open quotient (OQ), speed quotient (SQ), and area under the curve (AUC) have been used to conveniently describe the vibratory glottal cycle and quantify voice quality [12,14,15]. OQ is the ratio between duration when the glottis is open and that of the entire vibratory cycle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%