2016
DOI: 10.1049/iet-gtd.2015.0486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two energy storage options for optimum balancing of wind farm power outputs

Abstract: This paper presents a simple methodology for analysing and optimizing combined wind generation and storage schemes, using both technical and economic performance criteria.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of the optimal number of states generally depends on a number of factors related to the target application. For instance, some studies such as the one focussing on the comparison of two energy storage options in Hayes et al (2016), require long time histories (in that case 40 years) with short time steps. Assuming the same computational power as the one used for this study, and the same time step of 1 Hz (although the study cited uses a longer time step) generating this time history would require almost four days of computation using the NMC-32, and less than one day using NMC-8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of the optimal number of states generally depends on a number of factors related to the target application. For instance, some studies such as the one focussing on the comparison of two energy storage options in Hayes et al (2016), require long time histories (in that case 40 years) with short time steps. Assuming the same computational power as the one used for this study, and the same time step of 1 Hz (although the study cited uses a longer time step) generating this time history would require almost four days of computation using the NMC-32, and less than one day using NMC-8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…erefore, the development and the use of large-scale and high-efficiency energy storage technologies are the basis for future changes in the energy system [1][2][3][4][5]. As one of the promising approaches for energy storage, VRFB has drawn great attention since it possesses advanced characteristics such as flexible battery assembly design, long cycle life, large battery capacity, low self-discharge, and no cross contamination [6][7][8][9][10][11][12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Variation of cell efficiency (a) and discharge capacity (b) after 50 cycles of charge-discharge tests for cells equipped with GF and hydroxyl MWCNTs/GF electrode 8. Journal of Chemistry electrochemical catalytic activity and reversibility of the hydroxyl MWCNTs/GF electrode.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the existing reports generally focused on the comparison for pure electric energy storages [37][38][39] or thermal energy auxiliaries [40][41][42], and only a few scholars carried out the comparative analysis of electric energy storages and thermal energy auxiliaries [43,44]. Very few works contributed to the general evaluation method, which was applicable to these two kinds of additional equipment, and conducted a systematic comparison in the cogeneration system with the high penetration of wind power.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%