2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-5629(03)01011-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound in the assessment of the cervix to predict preterm delivery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
7

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
19
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…There are only a few studies where reference values for cervical AP diameter 12,15,17,18 are presented, but to the best of our knowledge no reference values for cervical funneling have been published. In three small studies, cervical length 9,10,21 and funneling 9,10 were assessed by 3D ultrasound. However, there are no ultrasound studies presenting reference values for all cervical dimensions (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are only a few studies where reference values for cervical AP diameter 12,15,17,18 are presented, but to the best of our knowledge no reference values for cervical funneling have been published. In three small studies, cervical length 9,10,21 and funneling 9,10 were assessed by 3D ultrasound. However, there are no ultrasound studies presenting reference values for all cervical dimensions (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De acordo com a revisão dos artigos indexados no Medline até março de 2006, oito pesquisas foram encontradas [11][12][13][14][18][19][20][21] . Quatro 11,19-21 delas relataram a aferição do volume da cérvice em gravidez única ou múltipla; quatro [12][13][14]18 focaram a medida do comprimento cervical.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
“…No entanto, outros estudiosos 13,14 , comparando a USG 2D com o 3D para análise da biometria cervical, em grávidas da população geral, entre o segundo e terceiro trimestre de gestação, detectaram diferença significante.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations