Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2010
DOI: 10.1097/sap.0b013e3181951720
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Different Vascular Delay Methods in a Rat Cranial Epigastric Perforator Flap Model

Abstract: The effectiveness of vascular delay in transverse rectus abdominis muscle flaps has been demonstrated in many studies. In deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps, however, the effectiveness of ligation of deep versus superficial epigastric vessels in producing delay is unclear. Using a rat model, we compared ligation of deep and superficial vessels with each other and with a (nondelayed) control group (n = 10). One vascular delay group (n = 10) had ligation of the contralateral cranial epigastric vessels (ho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Preconditioning of a flap with the purpose of opening the choke vessels that exist between neighboring territories, as an attempt to capture angiosomes that would otherwise be lost, has been clinically and experimentally investigated in models of flap delay 21 22 . Classic delay refers to a flap border incision, while strategic or vascular delay is defined as the specific ligation of vessels before flap elevation 23 . Although we do use selective, specific vessel ligation, we do not induce controlled ischemia in the flap region as is done in classical flap delay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preconditioning of a flap with the purpose of opening the choke vessels that exist between neighboring territories, as an attempt to capture angiosomes that would otherwise be lost, has been clinically and experimentally investigated in models of flap delay 21 22 . Classic delay refers to a flap border incision, while strategic or vascular delay is defined as the specific ligation of vessels before flap elevation 23 . Although we do use selective, specific vessel ligation, we do not induce controlled ischemia in the flap region as is done in classical flap delay.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). 17 The cranial and caudal borders of the flap were at the level of the tip of the xiphoid and anterior superior iliac spines, respectively. The flap was raised from lateral to medial at a level deep to the panniculus carnosus, with care taken during dissection of the identified perforator.…”
Section: Animalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, if the flap is nourished by only one perforator vessel, distal end necrosis can occur due to insufficient blood supply, oxidative stress, and cells apoptosis (Mohan, Zhu, Wang, Vijayasekaran, & Saint‐Cyr, 2016; Wang et al, 2019a; Wang et al, 2019b). Numerous measures have been developed to improve the survival of a flap with multiple vascular territories, such as transposition of a main vascular pedicle (Ding et al, 2017; Wang et al, 2019c), injection of angiogenic growth factors (Akimoto et al, 2013; Aksakal et al, 2016; Tao et al, 2016a), vascular delay (Lineaweaver et al, 2004; Mao et al, 2019; Seyhan, Deniz, Borman, Ulusal, & Cağlar, 2010), and use of venous superdrainage or arterial supercharging (Hallock & Rice, 2005; Park, Cho, Imanishi, & Chang, 2018; Mao et al, 2019; Xin, Luan, Mu, & Mu, 2013; Yi et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%