2022
DOI: 10.1186/s12871-022-01597-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two different uses of underbody forced-air warming blankets for the prevention of hypothermia in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery: a prospective randomized study

Abstract: Background Forced-air warming (FAW) is an effective method of preventing inadvertent perioperative hypothermia (IPH). However, its warming effects can be influenced by the style and position of the FAW blanket. This study aimed to compare the effects of underbody FAW blankets being placed under or over patients in preventing IPH. Methods Patients (n=100) undergoing elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery in the lateral decubitus position were random… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The operating room temperature was maintained at 21℃ ± 1℃, and all IV and irrigation fluids were administered at this temperature. All patients received forced-air warming, and the heater working temperature was set at 43℃ [ 13 ]. A gravity irrigation system that consisted of 2 (3-L) saline bags suspended 70 cm above the surgical shoulder joint was used in this study to create an inflow pressure for adequate intra-articular visualization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The operating room temperature was maintained at 21℃ ± 1℃, and all IV and irrigation fluids were administered at this temperature. All patients received forced-air warming, and the heater working temperature was set at 43℃ [ 13 ]. A gravity irrigation system that consisted of 2 (3-L) saline bags suspended 70 cm above the surgical shoulder joint was used in this study to create an inflow pressure for adequate intra-articular visualization.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the constructs evidence strength and quality, relative advantage and Cost were the most evident, and more barriers than facilitators were apparent (n = 43). Studies discussed evidence strength and quality with perceptions that quality and lack of credible evidence (especially regarding accuracy of temperature measuring devices) were a barrier to guideline implementation (Boet et al, 2017;Brodshaug et al, 2019;Levin et al, 2016;Matos et al, 2018;Munday et al, 2019;Munday et al, 2013;Scanlan, 2018;Simpson & Rodseth, 2019;Yin et al, 2022). Perioperative hypothermia prevention guidelines were also perceived as a low clinical priority (Boet et al, 2017;Duff, Walker, et al, 2014;Gabriel et al, 2019).…”
Section: Innovation Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a common complication in perioperative period, with an incidence of 25%~90% [2]. A series of clinically related in uencing factors may lead to this phenomenon, such as skin exposure in the operating area, patient age, anesthesia or operation type, cold ushing uid, low ambient temperature in the operating room, no heating of intravenous infusion, impaired thermoregulation control, etc [3][4][5]. Perioperative hypothermia increases the risk of surgical incision infection, coagulation dysfunction, increased intraoperative blood loss and postoperative chills, hypothermia also prolongs anesthesia recovery time, delays wound healing, increases hospitalization time, increases medical economic burden and reduces patient satisfaction [4,[6][7][8][9][10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%