2020
DOI: 10.25259/sni_35_2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of two different titanium cranioplasty methods: Custom-made titanium prostheses versus precurved titanium mesh

Abstract: Background: The aim of this study was to compare the results of two different titanium cranioplasties for reconstructing skull defects: standard precurved mesh versus custom-made prostheses. Methods: Retrospective analysis of 23 patients submitted to titanium cranioplasty between January 2014 and January 2019. Ten patients underwent delayed cranioplasty using custom-made prostheses; and 13 patients were treated using precurved titanium mesh (ten delayed cranioplasties, and three single-stage resection- rec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The holes also allowed for the drainage of liquids, such as CSF or blood, from the surgical site, avoiding cerebellar compression. 29,30 Finally, the implant material is characterized by higher biocompatibility and osseointegration as well as bonelike elasticity and strength, and it is also associated with lower susceptibility to infection. [31][32][33] Although artifacts due to the metal nature of the implant made it difficult to evaluate the postoperative MRI images, the use of different sequences on different planes and the comparison of pre-and postoperative images allowed us to rule out a residual or new compression of the cerebellum in all cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The holes also allowed for the drainage of liquids, such as CSF or blood, from the surgical site, avoiding cerebellar compression. 29,30 Finally, the implant material is characterized by higher biocompatibility and osseointegration as well as bonelike elasticity and strength, and it is also associated with lower susceptibility to infection. [31][32][33] Although artifacts due to the metal nature of the implant made it difficult to evaluate the postoperative MRI images, the use of different sequences on different planes and the comparison of pre-and postoperative images allowed us to rule out a residual or new compression of the cerebellum in all cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, infectious complications may occur with incidence up to 16 %, especially, when treating large bone defects and patients after previous post-cranioplasty infection (48). When comparing the titanium implants only, the use of 3D printed custom-made implants resulted in more satisfactory results than the use of pre-curved titanium mesh implants, which are more useful in treatment of smaller cranial defects (48,49). Due to their mechanical stability and satisfactory cosmetic results, custom made titanium implants can also be used in the treatment of bone defects after craniofacial or maxillofacial skeleton resections (50,51) or compound injuries, which may be especially diffi cult to reconstruct (52,53).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RPT specifically focuses on enhanced imagining tools providing the operator with the ability for precise preoperative planning, mirroring of the unaffected side, and designing a patient-specific prosthesis. [ 8 ] In our experience, RPT eliminates any discrepancy caused while making of impressions and models. [ 11 ] The prototype fabrication helps in the three-dimensional appearance and feel of the prosthesis, which was useful in surgical planning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 7 ] Custom-designed prefabricated Ti prostheses have the unique advantages of precise fit, reduced surgical time, lower possibility of infection, faster recovery, and excellent cosmetics in craniofacial reconstruction. [ 7 8 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%