Comparison of two different composite resins used for tooth reshaping and diastema closure in a 4-year follow-up

Ergin, Esra; Kütük, Zeynep Bilge; Cakir, FY; Gürgan, Sevil

doi:10.4103/njcp.njcp_36_18

Cited by 8 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…This might be attributed to proper handling of the matrix and steady flow of the materials as the celluloid matrix was inserted between the teeth down into the gingival sulcus and checked for inciso-gingival length to ensure proper resin composite material construction involving the entire emergence profile of the tooth. The findings were consistent with the previous investigations of Ergin et al, (2018) [ 11 ] and Kim, (2019) [ 10 ]. Furthermore, group B (bioclear matrix) showed successful scores, which were attributed to the proper selection of the bioclear matrix size according to the bioclear gauge and complete seating of the matrix after using the true contact [ 10 ].…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 94%

“…As hybrid resin composites were confirmed to have better overall performance in terms of esthetics and fracture than microfilled resin composites [ 11 ]. In this regard, nanohybrid resin composite (Grandio, Voco) was utilized in the current study.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This power analysis used an esthetic anatomical form score as the primary outcome. The effect sizes (W) of the comparator (celluloid conventional matrix method) equal 1 and the effect size of the intervention (bio clear matrix) equals 0.8 were calculated based upon the results of Ergin et al, (2018) [ 11 ] and estimated proportions for the experimental group based upon expert opinion. Using alpha (α) level of (5%) and Beta (β) level of (20%) i.e.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The secondary outcome involves clinical and radiographic marginal adaptation. The third outcome involves the patient's view in the forms of phonetics and food impaction [ 11 , 12 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Restoring black triangle with bioclear matrix versus conventional celluloid matrix method: a randomized clinical trial

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Open gingival embrasures form complex aesthetic and functional problems. This clinical trial assessed the bioclear matrix using injection molding technique against conventional celluloid matrix technique in management of black triangle. Methods A total of 26 participants were randomly divided into two groups (13 participants each) according to the technique used. In group (A) celluloid conventional matrix method was used, while in group (B) bioclear matrix with injection molding technique was used. The different outcomes (Esthetic evaluation, marginal integrity and patient satisfaction) were evaluated following the FDI criteria by two blinded examiners. The evaluation was done at (T0) (immediate after restoration); (T6) after 6 months; and (T12) after 12 months. Statistical analysis was done as categorical and ordinal data were presented as frequency and percentage values. Categorical data were compared using fisher’s exact test. Intergroup comparisons for ordinal data were analyzed utilizing the Mann–Whitney U test, while intragroup comparisons were analyzed using Friedman’s test followed by the Nemenyi post hoc test. The significance level was set at p ≤ 0.05 within all tests. Results Regarding radiographic marginal integrity and marginal adaptation, the bioclear matrix group revealed superior results when compared to celluloid matrix group with a significant difference between both groups at all intervals (p < 0.05); however no significant difference was detected at different intervals. While for proximal anatomical form and esthetic anatomical form, as well as phonetics and food impaction, all cases in both groups were successful with no statistical significant difference between groups. For the periodontal response, there was no significant difference between groups. However, there was a significant difference between scores measured at different intervals, with T0 being significantly different from other intervals (p < 0.001). Marginal staining revealed that there was no significant difference between groups. While, a significant difference between scores measured at different intervals. Conclusions The restorative management of the black triangle with both protocols was able to deliver superior aesthetic and good marginal adaptation; suitable biological properties; with adequate survival time. Both techniques were almost equally successful, however they are depending on the operator skills. Trial registration The clinical trial was registered in the (www.clinicaltrials.gov/) database in 23/07/2020; with the unique identification number NCT04482790.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 94%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The secondary outcome involves clinical and radiographic marginal adaptation. The third outcome involves the patient's view in the forms of phonetics and food impaction [ 11 , 12 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Restoring black triangle with bioclear matrix versus conventional celluloid matrix method: a randomized clinical trial

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Esthetics is currently an increasing concern for patients, particularly in anterior teeth, and clinicians are being progressively requested to provide highly esthetic results without increasing costs and clinical working time [1]. Irregular shape and tooth position, and the presence of diastemas and discolorations in the anterior region, are the main aspects for facial and smile asymmetry and disharmony and are responsible for esthetic complaints amongst patients [2,3]. The current approach for managing such complaints includes a variety of treatment options, such as prosthodontic rehabilitation, orthodontic treatment, and direct restorations [1,[3][4][5].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Direct Restorations for Anterior Esthetic Rehabilitation and Smile Symmetry Recovery: Two Case Reports

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Esthetics is an increasing concern for patients, particularly in anterior teeth. The current approaches to manage the esthetic demands include options such as prosthodontic rehabilitation, orthodontic treatment, and direct restorations. Direct restorative procedures for anterior teeth have become a reliable alternative, since current composite materials can mimic teeth’s esthetics and function perfectly. This article describes two clinical cases of anterior esthetic rehabilitations where the direct reshaping of the four maxillary incisors was performed using the buccolingual layering technique with the help of a silicone index. In Case 1, a diastema closure was also performed, whereas in Case 2, the replacement of old restorations was also carried out. It was possible to achieve excellent final esthetic results in both cases, recovering the smile symmetry, and both patients were satisfied. The literature supports the use of direct restorations in the anterior region with very good long-term prognosis. It is a minimally invasive approach that is reversible, repairable, cost-effective, and when combined with layering techniques and adequate restorative materials, it is possible to achieve good esthetic and functional outcomes. However, regular maintenance appointments are mandatory, and all cases should be carefully planned to ensure predictable and long-lasting results.

show abstract

Anterior Bölge Estetik Restorasyon Uygulamaları: 4 Olgu Sunumu

ÜLKÜ

Ünlü

2022

Selcuk Dental Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Amaç: Direkt minimal invaziv kompozit restorasyonlar ile estetik bir görünüm sağlamak ve takip sürecinde hastalara bağlı faktörlerin restorasyon prognozuna etkilerini değerlendirmektir. Vaka Raporu: Kliniğimize başvuran farklı yaş gruplarındaki iki hastada anterior dişlerindeki multidiastemalar, bir hastada diastema ve aks bozukluğu, bir hastada ise multidiastema ve periodontal kayıp nedeniyle mobilite şikayeti olması nedenleriyle direkt kompozit rezinler ile konservatif ve estetik restorasyonlar yapılmıştır. Klinik Sonuç/lar: Vakaların ilk 6 aylık kontrollerinde genel olarak restorasyonların başarılı bir şekilde kullanıldığı görülürken, herhangi bir renklenme veya kırık tespit edilmedi. Hastaların Covid-19 pandemisinin ilerleyen dönemlerindeki 1 yıllık kontrollerinde oral hijyenlerinde kötüleşme ile bazı restorasyonların insizalinde küçük kırıkların varlığı tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak; hastaya bağlı faktörlerin anterior estetik restorasyonların prognozunda belirleyici olduğu gözlemlenmiştir.

show abstract

Comparison of two different composite resins used for tooth reshaping and diastema closure in a 4-year follow-up

Cited by 8 publications

References 0 publications

Restoring black triangle with bioclear matrix versus conventional celluloid matrix method: a randomized clinical trial

Restoring black triangle with bioclear matrix versus conventional celluloid matrix method: a randomized clinical trial

Direct Restorations for Anterior Esthetic Rehabilitation and Smile Symmetry Recovery: Two Case Reports

Anterior Bölge Estetik Restorasyon Uygulamaları: 4 Olgu Sunumu

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About