Comparison of Two Detection Methods for a Declining Rodent, the Allegheny Woodrat, in Virginia

Abstract

Allegheny woodrats Neotoma magister are an imperiled small mammal species most associated with emergent rock habitats in the central Appalachian Mountains and the Ohio River Valley. The monitoring of populations and their spatio-temporal distributions typically has relied on labor-intensive live-trapping. The use of remote-detecting cameras holds promise for being an equally or more effective method to determine species presence, although trap-based captures permit the estimation of other parameters (e.g., survival, population size, site fidelity). In 2017, 2018, and 2020 we compared standard live-trapping with paired cameras for determining site occupancy of Allegheny woodrats in the central Appalachian Mountains of western Virginia. We further examined the influence of baited versus unbaited cameras at several sites of confirmed occupancy in 2019. We observed that the detection probability using cameras was approximately 1.7 times that of live-traps. Also, detection probability at baited camera traps was 1.3–2.0 times that of unbaited camera traps. Estimates of occupancy ranged from 0.44 to 0.49. Our findings suggest that the use of baited remote-detecting cameras provides a more effective method than live-trapping for detecting Allegheny woodrats. Our study provides a framework for the development of a large-scale, long-term monitoring protocol of Allegheny woodrats with the goals of identifying changes in the distribution of the species and quantifying local extinction and colonization rates at emergent rock outcrops and caves throughout the species’ known distribution.

Influence of Cattle Grazing on the Spatiotemporal Activity of Wildlife

“…All human activity was grouped into the same category, as activities such as hunting were infrequent and had no significant effect. Rodent and lagomorph detections were based on camera data; cameras set with a view of the ground, as ours were, can provide a comparable alternative to live trapping for estimates of small mammal activity across sites ( Rendall et al 2014 ;Thorne et al 2022 ). Model fit was assessed using AICc, and we report the top models and variable effects ( AICc > 2.0, P < 0.05).…”