2010
DOI: 10.2478/v10133-010-0074-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Two Available Platforms for Determination of RNA Quality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An alternative platform (Experion) is reported to show superior reproducibility and quantity assessment. 9,39,40 The storage and release of quality samples are the sine qua non of a modern biobank, and biobank personnel assume this responsibility on behalf of patient donors, funders, and researchers, including those who ultimately develop new patient interventions. Biospecimen science focuses on improving the quality of a biobank's unique human sample resource, and will henceforth ensure that fewer research studies are discredited because of substandard samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative platform (Experion) is reported to show superior reproducibility and quantity assessment. 9,39,40 The storage and release of quality samples are the sine qua non of a modern biobank, and biobank personnel assume this responsibility on behalf of patient donors, funders, and researchers, including those who ultimately develop new patient interventions. Biospecimen science focuses on improving the quality of a biobank's unique human sample resource, and will henceforth ensure that fewer research studies are discredited because of substandard samples.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been suggested that the Experion returns more reproducible results with a higher sensitivity than the Bioanalyzer due to its more automated sample preparation and chip loading procedure. 18,19 However, due to the low number of participating laboratories using the Experion and other alternative methods, a platform comparison becomes problematic. A comparison between the Agilent and Qiaxcel technologies has shown that Qiaxcel is more precise for certain types of RNA samples.…”
Section: Comparison Of Testing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, the algorithm compares three regions of the electrophoretic profile: 28S region, 18S region and pre‐18S regions. The highest score is 10 . Despite the DNAse I digestion integrated in the QIAcube extraction program, gDNA contamination occurred.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest score is 10. [28][29][30] Despite the DNAse I digestion integrated in the QIAcube extraction program, gDNA contamination occurred. The gDNA was clearly visible on the red curve at the end of the electrophoresis as a large peak between 55 s and 60 s. However, the additional step of both DNAse I digestion and filtration on a 100 kDa MWCO filter removed the contamination with high efficiency.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%