2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of treatment invasiveness between upfront debulking surgery versus interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III/IV ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancers in a phase III randomised trial: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0602

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

9
111
0
11

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(132 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
9
111
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Up to present, there were four randomized clinical trials comparing PDS and NAC followed by IDS for women with advanced ovarian cancer [36, 4345]. These trials demonstrated that NAC/IDS was noninferior to PDS with respect to PFS and OS and resulted in a lower incidence of treatment-related morbidity and mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Up to present, there were four randomized clinical trials comparing PDS and NAC followed by IDS for women with advanced ovarian cancer [36, 4345]. These trials demonstrated that NAC/IDS was noninferior to PDS with respect to PFS and OS and resulted in a lower incidence of treatment-related morbidity and mortality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SCORPION [44, 46] trial found that complete cytoreduction was achieved in 58% of women in the NAC/IDS arm and 46% of women in the PDS arm, with a shorter median operative time in the NAC/IDS arm. In JCOG0602 [45], Optimal debulking proportions in NAC/IDS and PDS were 82 and 37%, respectively. Most of HG-SOCs are sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy, and optimal debulking proportions increased in patients who underwent NAC.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A phase III trial to compare PDS with NACT-IDS proved that the survival outcomes of NACT-IDS were not inferior to those of PDS [6,7]. NACT allowed peritoneal diseases to shrink or disappear, which simplified complicated surgical procedures and reduced the perioperative complication rate [5,8,9]. Since then, NACT-IDS has been a treatment option for patients with bulky stage IIIC-IV ovarian carcinoma.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the report by Uno et al,8 the 15 NAC-treated patients accounted for nearly half of the total 32 patients, and the possibility that the effects of anticancer agents in the analyzed tissue specimens had biased the results of TF immunostaining was thus unable to be excluded. No pretreatment biopsies were taken from patients with EOC undergoing NAC at our hospital if cancer of the ovaries, fallopian tubes, or peritoneum was suspected on image diagnosis; if cells consistent with a malignant surface epithelial-stromal tumor were seen in an aspiration cytology of the tumor, pleural effusion, or ascites; or if biopsy and advanced-stage diagnosis by microscopy during NAC could be skipped because the patient met the criteria of CA125 of greater than 200 U/mL and carcinoembryonic antigen of less than 20 ng/mL 9,17,18…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%