2017
DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000000730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of treatment efficacy 1 and 2 years after thyroid remnant ablation with 1110 versus 5550 MBq of iodine-131 in patients with intermediate-risk differentiated thyroid cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, there have been many reports comparing the efficacy of low versus high RAI activity in patients with DTC; however, the optimal radioactivity remains cont roversial. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that the ablation rate with high RAI activity therapy was better than that with low radioactivity therapy in patients with DTC. 14,15 In contrast, most published studies have shown that low RAI activity was as effective as higher radioactivity in terms of response to therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, there have been many reports comparing the efficacy of low versus high RAI activity in patients with DTC; however, the optimal radioactivity remains cont roversial. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] A recent meta-analysis demonstrated that the ablation rate with high RAI activity therapy was better than that with low radioactivity therapy in patients with DTC. 14,15 In contrast, most published studies have shown that low RAI activity was as effective as higher radioactivity in terms of response to therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies suggest that the results of the thyroid remnant ablation and the response to therapy did not differ significantly between low-and high-dose groups in the treatment of low-or intermediate-risk patients with DTC. [29][30][31][32] We also calculated factors associated with successful ablation in FVPTC patients. The data indicated that all factors were similar among successful and unsuccessful ablation groups, including sex, risk level, primary nodule size, Tg level, presence of lymph node metastasis, multiple focal malignant nodule, bilateral malignant nodule, and extrathyroidal extension before RAI for low-to intermediate-risk FVPTC patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Erhöhte Raten an zweiten ablativen Radioiodtherapien in den Behandlungsarmen mit 1,1 GBq I-131 fanden sich in 3 weiteren randomisierten Studien, die differente Ablationsaktivitäten verglichen (6,11,19). In einer weiteren Studie mit einem Vergleich von 1,1 GBq versus 5,5 GBq I-131 war nicht die Therapieaktivität, sondern der Thyreoglobulin (Tg)-Spiegel vor der Ablation entscheidend für das spätere Tg-basierte Therapieansprechen (3). Die Nicht-Unterlegenheit von 1,1 GBq versus 3,0 GBq I-131 zeigte eine kleinere koreanische Studie mit Fokus auf Tumorstadien mit einer mikroskopischen extrathyreoidalen Infiltration und mit einer nodalen Metastasierung in das zervikozentrale Kompartiment (pT1a) (37).…”
Section: Standardisierung Bei Der I-131 Aktivitätsreduktionunclassified