“…Difference in %IOPR was 6%; IOPR% was 27.2% for PGA use (collectively) 63 85,86,92,93,95 (WMD = 0.08, P = 0.8) or latanoprost 0.005% 68,85,93,95,98,104 (WMD = −0.57, P = 0.07), but superior to timolol. 68,121,122,144 In summary, the vast majority of studies support IOPlowering superiority of latanoprost, 71,73,81,106 travoprost, 121,122 and bimatoprost, 124,125,137 over timolol, and although not entirely consistent. 72 PGAs were effective in eyes unresponsive or inadequately controlled with timolol, and remained effective long term.…”