2014
DOI: 10.5505/tjtes.2014.22725
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison Of Trauma Scores For Predicting Mortality And Morbidity On Trauma Patients

Abstract: BACKGROUND:In this study, we compared the anatomical, and physiological scoring systems trauma revised injury severity score (TRISS), revised trauma score (RTS), injury severity score (ISS), new injury severity score (NISS) to each other, to find out the most accurate and reliable trauma score for the risk classification of morbidity and mortality among the trauma patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
50
2
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(7 reference statements)
4
50
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[6] In a trauma patient, one of the major factors affecting mortality is the severity of the trauma. [4,7] Various scoring systems are utilized to evaluate injuries with an objective approach. Some of these scoring systems are anatomical, and some are based on physiological status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[6] In a trauma patient, one of the major factors affecting mortality is the severity of the trauma. [4,7] Various scoring systems are utilized to evaluate injuries with an objective approach. Some of these scoring systems are anatomical, and some are based on physiological status.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the calculation process, all injuries are identified, classified, and scored. [1][2][3][4] Frequently referenced scoring systems include the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), the Injury Severity Score (ISS), and New Injury Severity Score (NISS). [1,4] This study provides a new approach to evaluating medical malpractice claim cases, not only for forensic medicine specialists, but also for academics from all specialties who may be called by the courts to be an expert witness to assist with determining any responsibility of the physician in the cause of death.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That physiological state can be assessed objectively by RTS with the assessment of GCS, systolic blood pressure and respiratory rate, which are regulated by the autonomic nervous system that may be affected by intracranial haemorrhage volume of head injury (Alqarni et al, 2011;Orhon et al, 2014;Mohyuddin et al, 2015;Takahashi et al, 2015).…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Parameters used to assess RTS are Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), systolic blood pressure and respiratory rate ( Table 1). RTS has a range of values from 0 to 12 with four categorizations, such as delayed if the score is 12, urgent if the score is 11, immediate if the score is 3-10 and declared dead if the score is 0-3 (Rowland and Pedley, 2010;Alqarni et al, 2011;Sundstrøm et al, 2012;Orhon et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation