2003
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.181.2.1810421
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Transrectal Sonography and Double-Contrast MR Imaging When Staging Rectal Cancer

Abstract: If it is technically feasible, transrectal sonography is an accurate method for staging rectal cancer. In proximal or stenotic tumors, double-contrast MR imaging is the method of choice. Diagnostic accuracy of transrectal sonography and MR imaging is high for predicting bowel wall penetration.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
30
0
8

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
30
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The field of view is small, and stenotic or rectosigmoid tumours cannot be reached. For example Glaser et al had to withdraw 10% of patients due to stenosis, and Fuchsjäger et al 28% due to high location of the tumour (27,12).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field of view is small, and stenotic or rectosigmoid tumours cannot be reached. For example Glaser et al had to withdraw 10% of patients due to stenosis, and Fuchsjäger et al 28% due to high location of the tumour (27,12).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has limitations for lower rectal tumors and obese patients (16,29,30). In addition, it provided inadequate spatial resolution to identify early infiltration into mesorectal fat (31). An endorectal coil provides a high SNR and therefore can be used to discriminate individual layers of the rectal wall and differentiate the muscularis propria from the submucosa and mesorectal fat (17).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, endorectal-coil MRI has been shown to have higher T-stage accuracy, ranging from 71% to 85% (17)(18)(19)(20)(21). Moreover, excellent depiction of sphincter infiltration in lower rectal tumors can be achieved (31). However, the FOV is limited within 3 cm around the coil, and as a result the upper rectal tumors, lateral pelvic, and inferior mesenteric nodal involvement cannot be evaluated effectively (20,31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Все эти наблюдения отнесены к полному патологическому регрессу опухоли. Именно этот факт, по данным многих исследований, и определя-ет лучший результат комбинированного лечения у боль-ных раком прямой кишки [11,20,21]. В настоящее время хорошо известно, что определение характера регресса опухоли после химиолучевой терапии затруднительно и неточно, поэтому многие авторы предпочитают оце-нивать частоту полного клинического регресса опухоли [22,23,24].…”
unclassified
“…Наши данные согласуются с результатами исследований M. H. Fuchsjager с соавт. [20] и K. T. Hoffmann с соавт. [25], которые сообщают об аналогичной оценке степени ин-вазии кишечной стенки и определении наличия метас-тазов в лимфатических узлах.…”
unclassified