2003
DOI: 10.1364/ao.42.003418
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of transmission and the 90-degree holographic recording geometry

Abstract: We compare the system performances of two holographic recording geometries using iron-doped lithium niobate: the 90-degree and transmission geometry. We find that transmission geometry is better because the attainable dynamic range ͑M͞#͒ is much higher. The only drawback of transmission geometry is the buildup of fanning, particularly during readout. Material solutions that reduce fanning such as doubly-doped photorefractive crystals make transmission geometry the clear winner.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In In order to show the dispersion effect of the grating material, we assume that the grating is recorded in a photorefractive with the dispersion effect of the LiNbO 3 crystal calculated from equation (11). We can obtain that the wavelength selectivity becomes stronger with considering the dispersion effect from the expression of the Bragg mismatch parameter K. As a result, more wavelength components in the spectrum of the input UPB can not be diffracted effectively by the overlapping grating, which means that the input UPB is broadened in temporal domain after been diffracted by the VHG with the dispersion effect of the crystal.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In In order to show the dispersion effect of the grating material, we assume that the grating is recorded in a photorefractive with the dispersion effect of the LiNbO 3 crystal calculated from equation (11). We can obtain that the wavelength selectivity becomes stronger with considering the dispersion effect from the expression of the Bragg mismatch parameter K. As a result, more wavelength components in the spectrum of the input UPB can not be diffracted effectively by the overlapping grating, which means that the input UPB is broadened in temporal domain after been diffracted by the VHG with the dispersion effect of the crystal.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the two beams involved in grating recording or reconstruction may access two orthogonal surfaces (typically called the 90 geometry [11] ). Although many researchers have analyzed the diffraction characteristics of the finite size planar holographic gratings under continuous wave (CW) readout [12][13][14][15][16] , for the case that the finite size VHG is illuminated by a UPB, and the grating material dispersion is been considered, few studies have touched upon as we knew.…”
Section: . Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When a LiNb0 3 crystal is used, two holographic recording geometries are usually utilized: the 90-degree and transmission geometry. Although the attainable dynamic range (M/#) is much higher in the transmission geometry [9], but the scatter noise is much lower in the 90-degree geometry. Therefore, a 90-degree Fourier defocusing geometry is adopted in our miniaturized system (Fig.…”
Section: Background and Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For example, typical sensitivity obtained in LiNbO 3 :Fe:Mn crystals is 0.01cm/J with o-polarized 633nm light recording and 404nm light sensitizing 5 . For practical applications, the recording sensitivity is one of three important performances which measuring in holographic storage, and the larger values of sensitivity are required 6 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%