2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.fdj.2018.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of translucency for different thicknesses of recent types of esthetic zirconia ceramics versus conventional ceramics … (in vitro study)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[25] This perhaps is a result of denser crystalized material of zirconia compared to less crystalized lithium disilicate. Furthermore, based on the study by Al-Juaila E et al [26] glass-ceramics (Emax) show higher translucency values than crystalline based ceramics (zirconia) which can explain the results of this study. In theory, the laser can penetrate through lithium disilicate better than zirconia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[25] This perhaps is a result of denser crystalized material of zirconia compared to less crystalized lithium disilicate. Furthermore, based on the study by Al-Juaila E et al [26] glass-ceramics (Emax) show higher translucency values than crystalline based ceramics (zirconia) which can explain the results of this study. In theory, the laser can penetrate through lithium disilicate better than zirconia.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In theory, the laser can penetrate through lithium disilicate better than zirconia. [26] This is reflected in longer retrieval time as well as 1°C to 2°C lower pulpal temperatures in the zirconia compared to the lithium disilicate group. It is interesting to note here that even the highest recorded temperature of ~28°C in the pulpal chamber is still considered safe.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At a thickness of 1 mm, it was related that the mean TP values of conventional zirconia range from 4.83–9.10 [ 45 ]; For bovine teeth, the values range from 14.7–15.2, and for human teeth, from 15–19 [ 46 , 47 ]. In the current study, the recorded interval was 13.08–14.58.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The adjustment of the translucency of aesthetic dental restorative materials has been investigated, by the influence of filler size, and the difference between the transmitted, reflected colors and the translucency of experimental restorative materials were determined [ 47 , 48 , 49 ]. For zirconia, TP values were registered between 9.10 and 4.83 [ 50 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%