1994
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(94)90407-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of transcranial contrast Doppler sonography and transesophageal contrast echocardiography for the detection of patent foramen ovale in young stroke patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
119
0
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
119
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) The appropriate timing of the VM in relation to the injection of the contrast medium is under debate. The injection of the contrast agent was performed before, 4,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] during, 15,17,19 or after the VM. 15,20 In those studies in which the VM was performed after injection, the time delay between injection and VM was frequently not clearly specified in relation to the start or the end of injection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1) The appropriate timing of the VM in relation to the injection of the contrast medium is under debate. The injection of the contrast agent was performed before, 4,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] during, 15,17,19 or after the VM. 15,20 In those studies in which the VM was performed after injection, the time delay between injection and VM was frequently not clearly specified in relation to the start or the end of injection.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Furthermore, the question of whether the use of a diagnostic time window for MES appearance increases the specificity of the test without necessarily decreasing sensitivity is not yet resolved. 14,23,24 Time windows proposed between the intravenous injection of the contrast medium and its appearance in the MCAs are 6 heartbeats, 20 10 seconds, 20,21 15 seconds, 13 20 seconds, 24 22 seconds, 15 and 25 seconds. 11,14 A recent study described the necessity of including MES at least 20 to 25 seconds after the start of injection to achieve a high sensitivity; it may also be possible that no time window is necessary.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCD has been demonstrated to have high sensitivity and specificity for detection of rightto-left shunting when compared to contrast transesophageal echocardiography and is superior to transthoracic echocardiography. [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) with agitated saline has decreased sensitivity of detecting an intracardiac shunt in OSA patients with elevated BMI and large body habitus secondary to limited acoustic windows. 13,21 Using passage of a guide wire across the atrial septum during cardiac catheterization with intracardiac echocardiography guidance as the standard for diagnosing a PFO, TCD has a 98% sensitivity for making the diagnosis of PFO.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TCD is limited by its inability to identify the location of the shunt; however, almost all right-toleft shunts are due to PFOs or small ASDs since other etiologies, such as large trans-pulmonary shunting from pulmonary AVMs, are rare (1% of TCD exams). [15][16][17][18][19][20] Compared with heart catheterization for PFO detection, TCD is more sensitive than TEE since there is a 10% false negative rate with TEE because patients cannot perform a Valsalva maneuver with a TEE probe down their esophagus. 20,[22][23][24] The patients in our study with OSA and PFO did not undergo PFO closure, which would be needed to evaluate a cause and effect relationship.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The rate of detection of RLS in TCD study might be inferior to that on TEE study, because the sensitivity of TCD study in detecting RLS is less than that of TEE study. 16 Second, we were unable to perform peripheral venous ultrasound to detect DVT in all patients.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%