2017
DOI: 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Training Intensity Patterns for Cardiorespiratory, Speed, and Strength Exercise Programs

Abstract: Vetter, RE, Yu, H, Foose, AK, Adam, PJ, and Dodd, RK. Comparison of training intensity patterns for cardiorespiratory, speed, and strength exercise programs. J Strength Cond Res 31(12): 3372-3395, 2017-Designing effective exercise training programs is important for novice, regular, and elite individuals desiring improvements in physical fitness and performance outcomes without experiencing deleterious physiological or performance effects. The purpose of this research was to understand the impact of training in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 51 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Findings from recent research focusing on musculoskeletal guidelines in healthy adults suggest that a lower training frequency is more effective (i.e., 1 or 2 sessions per week) [9][10][11][12]. One meta-analysis [13] focusing on cardiorespiratory, speed, and strength exercise programs found no impact of training frequency at all but stressed the impact of exercise load. Patient-based research concerning training frequencies in physical rehabilitation is scarce, with no clear relationship shown between exercise frequency and diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Findings from recent research focusing on musculoskeletal guidelines in healthy adults suggest that a lower training frequency is more effective (i.e., 1 or 2 sessions per week) [9][10][11][12]. One meta-analysis [13] focusing on cardiorespiratory, speed, and strength exercise programs found no impact of training frequency at all but stressed the impact of exercise load. Patient-based research concerning training frequencies in physical rehabilitation is scarce, with no clear relationship shown between exercise frequency and diagnosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%