1994
DOI: 10.1016/0378-3820(94)90174-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of trace element contents of raw and clean commercial coals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Meanwhile, concentration of HTEs can also be reduced during the washing process. The removal efficiency of Ni content through coal cleaning vary significantly from~20% to~80% (DeVito et al, 1984;Akers, 1995;Quick and Irons, 2002;Han and Xu, 2003;Wang, 2007). In view of the application situation and the operation characteristics of coal cleaning processes in China, we presume an averaged removal efficiency of 58.49% independent of Ni content in coals.…”
Section: Nickel Content In Coals and Coal Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, concentration of HTEs can also be reduced during the washing process. The removal efficiency of Ni content through coal cleaning vary significantly from~20% to~80% (DeVito et al, 1984;Akers, 1995;Quick and Irons, 2002;Han and Xu, 2003;Wang, 2007). In view of the application situation and the operation characteristics of coal cleaning processes in China, we presume an averaged removal efficiency of 58.49% independent of Ni content in coals.…”
Section: Nickel Content In Coals and Coal Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported Hg removal efficiency of coal cleaning varies from about 30% to about 75% and almost all the physical coal cleaning procedures tested on Chinese coals have a Hg removal efficiency larger than 50% (Akers and Dospoy, 1994;Luttrell et al, 2000;Wang et al, 2003;Song et al, 2006;Wang, 2007). The As removal efficiency of coal cleaning can vary from about 40% to about 70% (Akers and Dospoy, 1994;DeVito et al, 1994;Finkelman, 1994;Luttrell et al, 2000;Wang et al, 2003;Wu et al, 2005;Wang, 2007) and most estimates are between 50% and 60%. Thus, we assume the average removal efficiency of Hg and As to be 50% and 54% respectively independent of mercury and arsenic content in raw coal.…”
Section: Averaged Content Of Hg As and Se In Raw Coal And Coal Prodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have confirmed that Se shows a high organic affinity in coal and in most cases exists in organic phases (Finkelman, 1994;Liu et al, 2003;Zhu et al, 2003;Wang, 2007). As a result, the removal efficiency of Se is relatively low and mostly ranges from 20% to 41.9% (DeVito et al, 1994;Finkelman, 1994;Wang et al, 2003;Song et al, 2006;Wang, 2007). In this study, we assume an average Se removal efficiency of 30%.…”
Section: Averaged Content Of Hg As and Se In Raw Coal And Coal Prodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DeVito, Rosendale, and Conrad (1994) show mercury concentrations at 0.11mg/kg in the total coal from 10 Pittsburgh Seam mines. This is equivalent to 3.67 mg/10 6 Btu.…”
Section: Demonstration Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%